Search for: "People v Gray"
Results 721 - 740
of 775
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
constantly question your assumptions: am I really understanding what this person is saying or their body language is communicating exercise patience, persistence and humility show respect Americans have different cultural backgrounds even when they "look" American because cultural background is not always apparent from physical appearance, accent, gesture and the like suing Asians very difficult thereafter to settle very public… [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 9:47 am
Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 11:38 pm
In a blogpost about the Microsoft/Alacatel business (Who cares who the real patent winner is in the Alcatel-Lucent v. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 1:13 am
DISTRICT COURTEASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKIntellectual Property'Gray Market Goods' Test Used to Find Earlier Version Of Genuine Product 'Counterfeit' Under Lanham ActJohnson & Johnson Consumer Companies Inc. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Consider again those nineteen people named on the third indictment and imagine them operating in the marketplace scenario described above. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Consider again those nineteen people named on the third indictment and imagine them operating in the marketplace scenario described above. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
Gray goods, or parallel imports of genuine goods, refer to a fact pattern in which someone other that the designated exclusive United States importer buys genuine trademarked goods outside the United States and imports them for sale into the United States in competition with the exclusive United States importer.[4] While the terms, "gray goods" and "parallel imports," are often used interchangeably, opponents of parallel imports prefer to refer… [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 12:19 am
Roy Gray NEW YORK COUNTYTortsContinuous Treatment Doctrine Applies, Tolling Limitations Period; Issues of Fact Preclude JudgmentHardeman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 9:20 am
Comcast Cable Communications People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 5:48 am
As everyone reading this knows, in 2006 the FDA invigorated - not impeded - preemption.But it's time to face the cold, gray dawn.The medical device industry, or at least the most innovative part of it, received major relief from product liability litigation yesterday in Riegel v. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 12:43 pm
-based Jim Myers, of Ropes & Gray. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 12:19 am
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 7:23 am
Downloadable papers from today's workshops:Chicago Crime & Punishment Workshop, Tom Tyler, Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
But you'll rarely find another oral argument as philosophical than the one just completed in Baze v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 8:23 am
People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 8:00 pm
,Canadian Association of University Teachers on copyright reform: (Michael Geist),Cisco on copyright in Canada: (Michael Geist),The new copyright debate: (Michael Geist),Media coverage of copyright debate: (Michael Geist), (more from Michael Geist), (and more from Michael Geist), (and more from Michael Geist),Copyright delay demonstrates power of Facebook: (Michael Geist),Access Copyright claims copyright reforms may be on hold… [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 7:42 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
New York dealt with this recently when a federal judge struck down in Alexanxder v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 3:10 pm
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
