Search for: "People v High" Results 721 - 740 of 13,359
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jan 2009, 1:05 pm
The High Court rejected the application. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 9:55 am by Mike Madison
Since I have never practiced maritime law, however, and don’t really know my way around a ship or a boat, I take my pleasures vicariously, such as through the Supreme Court’s recent opinion in Lozman v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:46 am
"The best thing I can do is help people realize there's a change that's needed to prevent this from happening again. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:53 am
It's not just people on trucks or cranes who are at risk of coming in contact with a high-voltage overhead power line. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 9:58 am by Cathryn Hopkins, Olswang
The US Supreme Court is expected to hand down its judgment in the high profile, heavily debated case of Florida v Department of Health and Human Services before its 2012 term draws to a close at the end of June. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:15 pm by Walter Olson
Tags: Article V, Cato Institute, constitutional law Randy Barnett, “Our Republican Constitution” is a post from Overlawyered - Chronicling the high cost of our legal system [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 1:15 pm
Did the fact that Jackson's brother was wearing red pants, is Black, and was present in Skyline (a high-crime area in San Diego with a hefty gang presence) likely lead the police to suspect that Jackson and his brother might be gang members? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
People v Sivells and People v Arotin held that a sex offender making an application for a downward departure bears the burden of establishing his or her entitlement to relief. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:07 am by Walter Olson
Loewen trial is at all typical, his wouldn’t exactly be a name high on my list. [read post]
29 Apr 2018, 10:22 am
More significantly, the court granted the country’s first ever injunction based on a SEP.Sony appealed to the Beijing Municipal High People’s Court (the "Court"), who this month has handed down a decision confirming the first-instance result, the injunction, and the legal tests behind them. [read post]