Search for: "People v Lord"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,806
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2015, 7:43 am
Thus in Pham v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:26 am
– Pugh v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 7:13 am
In times of plenty, people avoid going to court and spend their time making money through commercial exploitation. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 4:18 am
Austin's employer was a non-subscriber.And the court also upheld the lower court's ruling in Seabright Insurance Co. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2015, 11:04 pm
However, in the famous case of Street v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 6:45 am
But there we go – that is the “Carrollian” effect of the rule to which both Lord Neuberger and Baroness Hale referred. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 12:22 am
This Kat posted a short report of the Court of Appeal, England and Wales, judgment delivered by Lord Justice Floyd in Warner-Lambert Company, LLC v Actavis Group Ptc EHF & Others [2015] EWCA Civ 556, and has in the meantime been cogitating and ruminating (hard as that is for a non-ruminant carnivore) on what it all means.To remind readers on where we were before this appeal decision, Warner-Lambert marketed the drug pregabalin for three authorised indications -- epilepsy,… [read post]
7 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
The judge, Lord Burns, decided (unsurprisingly) that the evidence given by Mr Coulson at the Tommy Sheridan trial was not relevant to the live issues at that trial. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 10:31 pm
The joining of two people in a life of mutual fidelity signifies to us the mystery of the union between Christ and his Church, and so it is worthy of being honored among all people. [read post]
2 Jun 2015, 10:45 am
Indeed, Lord Justice Ackner referred to the case of R v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 1:36 am
What needs to be said, however, is that Lord Diplock's comments in Star Industrial Co Ltd v Yap Kwee Kor further support Lord Neuberger's conclusions and highlight the distinction between goodwill in different jurisdictions through the existence of separation of judiciaries; i.e. not one court can decide an issue of a foreign court. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
Bush, Hamdan v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 4:43 am
That was on the basis of the House of Lords decision in Din v Wandsworth LBC and the Court of Appeal decision in Dyson v Kerrier DC. [read post]
20 May 2015, 3:02 am
In that judgment (with which both Lord Clarke and Lord Wilson agree) the Court carefully reviews the history of Wilkinson v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]
13 May 2015, 4:37 am
Lord Neuberger reviewed a long list of authorities of the House of Lords, the Privy Council and that of the Court of Appeal in Anheuser-Busch Inc v Budejovicky Budvar NP [1984] FSR 413, 462. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:59 am
If it were enough for a claimant to merely establish reputation in the jurisdiction without having a significant number of people who are customers, it would tip the balance too much in favour of protection for the trader. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
In the very type of case under consideration, it can fairly be said that anyone who is homeless is vulnerable, as Lord Glennie pointed out in Morgan v Stirling Council [2006] CSOH 154, [2006] HLR 95, para 4. [read post]
7 May 2015, 1:02 pm
Mayo v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:00 am
When Chambers appealed, arguing that Nebraska courts should take judicial notice of God for this purpose, at least three people offered to represent the Lord on appeal but He did not get involved. [read post]
