Search for: "People v Younger" Results 721 - 740 of 1,100
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2012, 3:52 pm by Lovechilde
We look forward to swift, fair, and comprehensive nationwide implementation of the important administrative steps announced today on this thirtieth anniversary of the prescient Supreme Court decision in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 2:48 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  People don’t understand counterintuitive rules, and the rules without an exemption are counterintuitive. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:14 am by David Oscar Markus
That is because the legislative and executive branches are directly accountable to the people through elections, and its members know they would be removed swiftly from office were they to enact such rules,” he wrote. [read post]
15 May 2012, 7:48 am by Aileen McColgan, Matrix.
On 25 April 2012 the Supreme Court handed down two major judgments on age discrimination: Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police [2012] UKSC 15 and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes [2012] UKSC 16. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:05 am by Ruth Bonino
 The reason for this disadvantage was that people in Mr Homer’s age group did not have time to acquire a law degree; and the reason why they did not have time was that they were soon to reach the age of retirement. [read post]
1 May 2012, 10:14 am
  And what they might well have meant is to punish extra hard people who molest people younger than ten. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 12:24 pm by Jim Gerl
  In later installments, I have discussed the seminal decision of TK & SK ex rel LK v. [read post]