Search for: "People v. Akin"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,213
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
What’s on their Minds: Some Post Schwartzwald Foreclosure Standing Stuff. Bank of America v. Kuchta.
12 Jan 2014, 1:26 pm
v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 2:42 pm
As the Court of Appeals has explained, where a police officer has probable cause to believe that the driver of an automobile has committed a traffic violation, a stop does not violate the state or federal constitutions and neither the primary motivation of the officer nor a determination of what a reasonable traffic officer would have done under the circumstances is relevant akin to People v Robinson and Whren v United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 8:02 am
EFF cited a 6th Circuit case, US v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am
The plaintiffs in Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Wood argue that federal law compels them to act contrary to their religious obligations, by requiring them to offer (and pay for and administer) employee health insurance plans that include contraception coverage. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
__________ The Case Opinion:Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP v. [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 1:09 pm
Pataki and People v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 4:06 pm
The court notes that the Legislature has sought to protect young persons who have violated the criminal statutes of this State from acquiring the stigma that accompanies a criminal conviction akin to People v. [read post]
It’s Getting Icy Out, So Don’t Fall and Hurt Your (Non-Diverse Defendant in a) Hip (Replacement MDL)
20 Dec 2013, 8:59 am
Dec. 10, 2013), and Akin v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 12:51 pm
In People v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
The case, Stewart v. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 3:37 pm
Brown, People v. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 2:55 pm
Fuller and People v. [read post]
TV and radio transmissions in spa establishments are communications to the public, says AG Sharpston
28 Nov 2013, 12:18 am
So:Still investigating: Merpel can't really decide1) Is a spa more akin to a hotel or a dentist waiting room? [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm
People v Sivells and People v Arotin held that a sex offender making an application for a downward departure bears the burden of establishing his or her entitlement to relief. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 11:01 am
Pataki and People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2013, 1:54 pm
Griffin v. [read post]
9 Nov 2013, 7:19 pm
In People v. [read post]
7 Nov 2013, 3:12 pm
Irwindale v. [read post]
5 Nov 2013, 1:14 pm
Thus, a timely protest is an essential prerequisite for relief under a CPL 330.30 (1) claim of an error of law, unless the error has deprived the defendant of a fundamental right akin to People v Davidson, People v Padro and People v Antommarchi. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
Thus, primarily because of the "legal stigma" attached to warrantless and suspicionless stops, the People bear the burden of proving at a suppression hearing that the particular checkpoint in question was conducted in a non-discretionary manner, that is, the officers did not exercise individual discretion as to which cars to stop or what questions to ask akin to People v Cabrera. [read post]
