Search for: "People v. Germany"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,215
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
The court-enforced Constitution fully displaces other institutional forms of constitutional argument such as legislative constitutional duty only in the mid-twentieth century, as the Court becomes identified with Brown v. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:00 am
Furthermore, in retaliation, OPPO has multiple countersuits pending against Nokia in Germany, relating to technology used in Nokia’s base stations. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 11:48 am
Pulte v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 2:33 pm
Instead, it may be facts or evidence from which reasonable inferences may be drawn, beyond the mere proximity of two people themselves. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 1:31 pm
Germany doesn’t protect privacy, but it does protect dignity and personal honor. [read post]
21 Feb 2021, 1:47 am
Ericsson v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm
In U.S. federal court, it's not impossible but certainly rather difficult to satisfy the eBay v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 9:53 am
One influential decision, Malewicz v. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
When that news broke, a few people in the industry were already wondering about whether the next level of escalation would be an anti-anti-antisuit motion. [read post]
14 May 2022, 12:38 pm
R.M.R. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 am
Apple: things may get better or worse for Macs, iOS devices seem safe (FOSS Patents) Apple – These are the patents Google gave to HTC to assert against Apple (FOSS Patents) Apple – Update on ITC investigation of Apple’s first complaint against HTC (FOSS Patents) Google – Google objects to judge’s proposal for jury selection – UPDATE: judge overrules objections – Oracle v Google (FOSS Patents) Google – Judge inclined to order “the top… [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 3:20 am
Thermo-Ply, Inc (Patently-O) 7th Circuit rejects Zippo sliding scale for personal jurisdiction: Poulsen Roser A/S v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:56 am
Shen v. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am
(iv) The ECHR is concerned to guarantee rights that are practical and effective, not theoretical or illusory (see See eg Von Hannover v Germany (2005) 40 EHRR 1, [71]). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
(EPLAW) Cheapflights: OHIM excludes likelihood of confusion between conflicting signs, due to very low degree of distinctive character of earlier marks: T-460/09; T-461/09 (Class 46) General Court upholds opposition brought by PEPE JEANS against PEPEQUILLO CTM application: T-580/08 (Class 46) Royal treatment rejected in Luxembourg: T-397/09 (Class 46) ‘G’: Emram v OHIM: Guilty against Gucci (Class 46) General Court: summer time I and II – ‘Space of… [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 4:48 pm
Halvi v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 4:06 pm
This is very similar to the approach adopted by the High Court of this Jurisdiction in NT1 v Google and in Ireland in Townsend v Google under the pre-GDPR data protection legislation. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:12 am
If Amazon v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 6:07 am
This point includes relevant text of a recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights, Eweida and Others v. [read post]
