Search for: "People v. Kagan"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,730
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2015, 8:16 am
Texas case, which extended Due Process to homosexual people and banned laws criminalizing homosexual conduct. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 1:22 pm
… Why did people think that this was the governing law? [read post]
11 Oct 2018, 9:01 pm
Wainwright (1986) and Panetti v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm
Gershengorn argues before a six justice bench in Ziglar v. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am
During Wednesday’s argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
19 Oct 2016, 8:45 am
That’s what I think people try to do. [read post]
14 May 2019, 3:22 am
Litman’s “three paragraph” test is silly and disingenuous, though people seize upon whatever they can to make their pitch, particularly when it’s made to people who haven’t a clue about how ridiculous the argument is. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 12:17 pm
Yesterday, the Court heard oral arguments in Mayorkas v. [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 1:14 pm
Elena Kagan and Alan Rozenshtein analyzed the five-hour Thompson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 11:19 am
Auer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
The concept made sense back in 1984, when the Supreme Court held in Chevron v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:08 pm
Alito Jr. would have the Court’s opinion in Harris v. [read post]
19 Apr 2013, 6:54 am
Justice Kagan has been named to TIME’s 2013 list of its one hundred most influential people in the world. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 3:57 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 May 2024, 4:05 pm
However, Justice Kagan’s majority opinion ignored an important sense of how and why people express themselves, so as to make art. [read post]
5 May 2011, 11:17 am
Supreme Court’s decision in Skilling v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 8:43 am
The case, Denezpi v. [read post]
Supreme Court Endorses Neutrality Triangulation Approach to Constitutionality of Platform Regulation
22 Aug 2024, 7:00 am
Last month’s decision in Moody v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 11:50 am
Justice Kagan asked Mr. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 5:51 am
In doing so, the Court looked at the VRA with fresh eyes, devising a legal standard that gives additional leeway to states that have imposed voting restrictions in recent years.The case is Brnovich v. [read post]
