Search for: "People v. Winters"
Results 721 - 740
of 798
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2009, 9:11 am
Winters v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 5:27 am
I strongly encourage people who care about gender and racial equality to deconstruct the gender-coded "temperament" argument and to ignore the AFJ and Rosen's citation to it.Note: I found the AFJ on WESTLAW, which is a paid legal research database. [read post]
7 May 2009, 2:38 pm
Latest Analyis: Scalia v. [read post]
11 Apr 2009, 7:38 am
Supreme Court, In U.S. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Afro-IP) Australia Major changes to Patents Act proposed; proposed changes anger Australian patent attorneys (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) (Managing Intellectual Property) IP examination centre in Melbourne to boost Australian innovation and jobs (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court: ‘Use it or lose it’ approach confirmed: E & J Gallo Winery v Lion Nathan (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Bulgaria M-Tel ‘best Bulgarian brand’ in… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:00 pm
Spencer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 11:33 am
Windows MS Office opinion: Mac Office 2008 sucks v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:54 am
Supreme Court dealt with a similar issue, see this post on Winter v. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 12:57 am
LITIG. 1, Winter 2006, para. 3 & n.5. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 10:08 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 2:40 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Inst. v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 5:35 am
In a sign of things to come, Justice Roberts has already employed the ‘Procedural’ route this term in Winter v. [read post]
16 Dec 2008, 6:13 am
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 7:31 pm
Under these circumstances, when the time period charged, namely seven months, approaches the nine-month period found to be per se unreasonable in People v Beauchamp (74 NY2d 639; see People v Sedlock, 8 NY3d at 538), the People are subjected to "proportionally heightened scrutiny" as to whether their inability to provide more precise times is justified (id at 539). [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
In Winter v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:00 pm
What is the dress code for the Winter Gala? [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 3:24 am
The Top Gear Winter Olympics The Winter Olympics was never this interesting. 5. [read post]
21 Nov 2008, 1:36 pm
’ paper by Graeme Clark SC (IP Down Under) Full Federal Court decision concerning brand reputation in context of ‘lookalike’ products and famous brands: Hansen Beverage Company v Bickfords (Australia) Pty Ltd (Mallesons Stephen Jaques) Federal Court holds that grace period applicable to a ‘parent patent’ is different to that of its divisional ‘child’: Mont Adventure Equipment v Phoenix Leisure Group (IP Down… [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:57 pm
However, this moment is much more encompassing than right v. left or red v. blue. [read post]
