Search for: "Pointer v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 782
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2023, 9:46 pm by Michael Douglas
  In this sense, it might be a pointer that helps us to eventually solve this interpretative problem on our own. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 4:00 am
[So much for an ordinary day in an august courthouse.]United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:23 am by Russ Bensing
These factors were articulated way back in 1972 by the Supreme Court in Neil v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 7:56 am by Michael Froomkin
Purcell (Corporate Privacy Group), Members: Joseph Alhadeff (Oracle), Ana Anton (NC State Computer Science), Ramon Barquin (Barquin Int’l), J. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 3:24 am by Russ Bensing
  Here’s my pointers: 1. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 9:16 am by Eugene Volokh
Constitution and not just of the state constitution, I’m inclined to think that there’s a substantial probability that the U.S. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:24 pm by admin
Professor Cheng may have over-generalized in stating that judges are epistemically incompetent to make substantive expert determinations. [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:03 am
This was so even though a single action may be preceded by multiple physical movements of the purchaser (eg moving a mouse so that a mouse pointer is over a button or a double click). [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 7:09 am
  The other, which has gotten less attention [though Jon Adler did have a pointer to it here on the VC last week], is the DC Circuit’s decision to enter a default judgment against the government of North Korea in Kim v Democratic Republic of North Korea. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm by Rick
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
While the Court supports its ruling with over 50 pages of factual findings, its holding was essentially a foregone conclusion once the Court determined that it agreed with the reasoning of VFB LLC v. [read post]