Search for: "Ponder v State"
Results 721 - 740
of 814
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
Do people actually know their state has decriminalized marijuana? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 4:06 am
The same thing happened with the abortion rights case, Roe v. [read post]
10 May 2011, 3:34 pm
When the Court turned to the second case, Virginia v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 2:20 pm
What this book does not do is to warn the casual reader that it is confined to the experience, the history and the analysis of the United States. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:01 am
Part V of that Act provides a legislative framework for legal services including advocacy to be offered by businesses consisting of lawyers and non-lawyers. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 3:31 am
Disparate impact isn’t proof of racism, but rather gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of racism because proof of racial animus is often hard to identify and so the Supreme Court in the 1971 case of Griggs v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 1:47 pm
Under the Aronson v. [read post]
23 Sep 2008, 12:08 am
After all, Universal v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 4:41 pm
State, 2018 Fla. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:33 am
In that case, Winzer v. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:07 am
Real lawyers can have a real impact on the state of the law. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 4:23 am
This is a choice made by the Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Take, for instance, the recent Ontario case, B. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 3:21 am
That was the question the 6th Circuit wrestled with in their decision last week in Muniz v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:40 am
As Noel Erinjeri pointed out at Fault Lines, the Supreme Court in Bearden v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
I won't quite say that the brain-in-a-vat issue is exactly raised in the Supreme Court case of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm
Take, for instance, the recent Ontario case, B. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:33 am
Looking for something to ponder? [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:02 am
Jones v. [read post]
29 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Much of Masur’s book focuses on debates over state law and state-level civil rights reform efforts, whereas my collection focuses on federal law and national-level constitutional reform efforts. [read post]
