Search for: "Power v. Holder"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,841
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2019, 11:12 am
In her FTC v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
Supreme CourtIn Allen v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 12:04 am
In Taylor v Mina An Ltd [2019] UKUT 249 (LC) the Upper Tribunal has overturned a refusal of a Rent Repayment Order by the First Tier Tribunal. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
TM holder free riding/trolling: pressure on mark exclusions/defenses. [read post]
30 Jul 2019, 9:46 am
The only criticism which has been drawn however has been upon the unappealable nature of this tribunal and the high amount of $30,000 being involved as a punitive power. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 6:00 am
Holder. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 10:47 pm
& Ors. v M1 Limited & Ors. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 12:54 pm
In reaching its conclusion, the Court reiterated that Article 24(1) Brussels Ia does not encompass all actions concerning rights in rem in immovable property, but only those which both come within the scope of th Regulation and are actions which seek to determine the extent, content, ownership or possession of immovable property or the existence of other rights in rem therein and to provide the holders of those rights with protection for the powers which attach to their interest… [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 12:03 pm
A patent holder could control a market, limit competition, and raise prices for us all. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:17 am
Overview of the Regulation A+ Offering Circular for Crypto Tokens By Bart Mallon Co-Managing Partner, Cole-Frieman & Mallon LLP It is generally accepted that the initial coin offering (ICO) from mid-2017 is dead and that firms raising money for their blockchain or token projects will need to do so in a way that is compliant with SEC laws and regulations. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Texas v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:02 pm
Co. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:30 am
Sebelius, by construing the individual mandate in the Affordable Care Act as a tax in order to avoid the constitutional issues posed by treating it as an exercise of the commerce power.1 The Court also invoked the canon in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District Number One (NAMUDNO) v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 12:53 pm
TD Bank N.A. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 6:32 am
A Series Examining Deadlock Among the Owners of Closely Held Corporations, Limited Liability Companies and Partnerships Shotgun provisions are a form of weapons control, like the mutually assured destruction that has – thankfully so far, at least – kept the world powers from global conflagration. [read post]
2 Jul 2019, 5:38 am
Dagenhart and United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am
Among the cases he worked on in the 1953 term was Barsky v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 2:53 pm
In Jensen v. iShares Trust, holders of ETF shares purchased in a secondary market, i.e. not directly from the issuer, attempted to bring a Section 11 suit against the issuer. [read post]
