Search for: "Powers v. Commonwealth" Results 721 - 740 of 1,069
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2012, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
By 1836 the commonwealth's Supreme Judicial Court could oversee discovery, entertain cases with multiple parties, and grant injunctions and- specific performance. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:35 am by Eugene Volokh
For an example of a state high court decision that affirmed a citizen’s conviction for surreptitiously recording his encounter with the police, see Commonwealth v. [read post]
7 May 2012, 12:06 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Historically, Commonwealth infringement required use as a TM. [read post]
6 May 2012, 2:29 pm by Sam Murrant
The Foreign and Commonwealth Office’s Report on Democracy and Human Rights To see this report, in all its somewhat lengthy glory, click here. [read post]
1 May 2012, 8:50 pm by John Elwood
Next up is Fairey v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by Wessen Jazrawi
APPGER and extraordinary rendition  Panopticon has blogged on the First Tier Tribunal’s decision on the set of requests made by the All Party Parliamentary Group on Extraordinary Rendition (“APPGER”) to the Foreign & Commonwealth Office: APPGER v Information Commissioner and the Foreign and Commonwealth Office EA/2011/0049-0051. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:57 am by Tom Cummings
In Kennett Square Specialities v WCAB (Cruz), the claimant filed a claim petition alleging that he suffered a work-related injury to his lower back. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:05 am by Daniel Richardson
By Daniel RichardsonIn re Town Highway No. 20, Town of Georgia, 2012 VT 17.At first glance, the SCOV has had a slow year. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 1:00 pm by Benjamin Wittes
Earlier today, I had the pleasure of visiting Professor Jack Goldsmith’s “Foreign Relations Law” class, which is studying Hamdan v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 10:00 am by G.A. Napier
However, in a recent as yet unpublished case from the Court of Appeals for Kentucky, K.H. v Cabinet, issued on December 22, 2011, the Cabinet has run into a limit on their power. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:44 am by Eugene Volokh
Even if V just says “I’ll kill you,” D must flee; that might not play as much into V’s hands (if V’s goal is really to kill D and not just chase him away), but it will still help V exercise unresisted power over D. [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 7:34 am
For more details on the legal analysis involved in determining someone's actual knowledge read Commonwealth v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
Douglas wrote: “Books must serve as powerful agencies of social, economic, or political reform. [read post]