Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,483
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
’s right to the monies, the Appellate Division, Second Department, thought that the underlying order was “improvidently granted,” since the “competing claims to the sales proceeds” first needed to be addressed in that other case.There was no claiming otherwise.# # #DECISIONP. v P. [read post]
24 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
In Queen v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:08 am
In Liddie v United Community Church of God, (NY Queens Co Sup Ct, April 30, 2013), a New York trial court dismissed on res judicata and collateral estoppel grounds a suit against United Community Church by a woman who claims she was sexually assaulted by the church's pastor while attending a bible study class at the the church. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:49 pm
Naul, 3 Misc 3d 1101(A) (Crim Ct, Queens County 2004); People v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 5:32 pm
The Supreme Court, Queens County, denied the petition, and the owner appealed. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 6:25 am
During a hay ride on a school field trip to the Green Meadows Farm in Floral Park, Queens, kindergarten student Elizabeth David was injured when a bump on the trail propelled her from her seat to the wagon’s floor.When the Queens County Supreme Court denied the school's request that the case be dismissed, Saint Raymond’s appealed to the Appellate Division, Second Department, which reversed.According to the AD2, while schools are under a duty to adequately… [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 7:33 am
Much of the queens’ vernacular, body language and movements come from the drag world’s — especially white queens’ — interpretation of black femininity. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 3:00 am
The judge focused on Shaffer v. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
The Queen’s Speech and human rights The Queen’s Speech included various announcements of potential interest to law and religion specialists, the most important of which was probably the proposed new Bill of Rights that will reform the Human Rights Act 2010. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 2:22 pm
The Prime Minister and Cherry and others v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Joseph v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please follow this link: Bensen v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Term's decision, please use this link: Hurtado v. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:25 am
In Swezey v. [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 4:00 am
In Maronda v. [read post]
25 Aug 2012, 9:30 am
The Chisholm v Lindsay decision was released by the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta in Calgary on February 3, 2012. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 7:52 am
Cos. v. [read post]
26 May 2022, 8:03 am
“Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench Finds Conflict of Interest for Class Counsel Also Representing Individual” — “In Smith v Lafarge Canada Inc, 2022 ABQB 289 [Smith], the Court of Queen’s Bench considered a preliminary application arising out of a proposed class action which involved claims advanced on behalf of the proposed class as well as individual claims specific to the proposed representative plaintiff. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 7:15 am
” (Child and Family Services of Winnipeg v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 3:00 am
Kirsch (Notre Law School) (arguing for citizenship-based taxation) and Bernard Schneider (Queen Mary University of London School of Law) (arguing for residence-based taxation). [read post]
