Search for: "Queen v. Queen"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,482
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Sep 2019, 1:08 pm
James Morgan (Adelaide Law School, The University of Adelaide) has posted Offences Against the Person and Sexually Transmitted Diseases: Aubrey v the Queen (2017) 260 CLR 305 (Adelaide Law Review, Vol. 39, No. 1, 2018) on SSRN. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:49 am
” 1431: Aidan O’Neill QC argues that in the advice to the Queen to prorogue Parliament there was an error in law. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 1:03 pm
Following the Queen’s signing of an Order in Council authorising the prorogation of Parliament last week, an urgent motion had been brought seeking to suspend the prorogation. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm
The Administrative Court will give judgment in the facial recognition case of The Queen (on the application of Bridges) v Chief Constable of South Wales Police on 4 September 2019. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 10:29 am
(Section 9 of the Constitution Act, 1867 declares, “The Executive Government and Authority of and over Canada is hereby declared to continue and be vested in the Queen” and section 10 refers to the Governor General “carrying on the Government of Canada on behalf and in the Name of the Queen”.) [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 12:41 am
He refers to Burmah Oil v LA [1964] UKHL 6 noting there appeared to be no difference between the Scottish and English position on prorogation. [read post]
2 Sep 2019, 9:09 am
The order, having already been signed by the Queen, meant that the matter was not justiciable, and the privilege to sign the Order was that of the Queen alone, separate to the advice. [read post]
Alice: Benevolent Despot or Tyrant? Analyzing Five Years of Case Law Since Alice v. CLS Bank: Part I
29 Aug 2019, 2:15 pm
It’s been five years since the Supreme Court remade the law of patent eligibility in Alice Corp Pty Ltd v. [read post]
Alice: Benevolent Despot or Tyrant? Analyzing Five Years of Case Law Since Alice v. CLS Bank: Part I
29 Aug 2019, 2:15 pm
It’s been five years since the Supreme Court remade the law of patent eligibility in Alice Corp Pty Ltd v. [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 4:45 am
Serrone v Southbridge Towers, Inc. [read post]
24 Aug 2019, 6:30 am
[We're moving this up, because we've received an updated version of the program. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 10:00 am
The facts underlying Allen v. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:40 pm
A Media Communications and List has of course been in existence since 2017, although as Chief Master Marsh pointed out in Mezvinsky & Anor v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWHC 1261 (Ch), it is not yet a designated specialist list: “[13]…It was not created by a provision in the CPR, or in statute, and without underplaying its significance, it is a means by which work that is already within the Queen’s Bench Division is allocated for its… [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 1:09 pm
The program for the annual meeting of the American Society for Legal History, to be held in Boston, November 21-24, 2019, has been announced. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:10 am
The Queen, (Victoria Ct. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
In Schuylman v. [read post]
20 Aug 2019, 9:01 am
Supreme CourtIn Allen v. [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 8:18 pm
It was also submitted for judicial review to the Federal Court in Chrétien v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 5:45 pm
In the case of Ramirez v. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 8:32 am
The July 24, 2019 Court of Appeals opinion in May v. [read post]
