Search for: "RE v. State"
Results 721 - 740
of 40,202
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2007, 12:35 am
The dismissal in Relevant Church v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 7:14 pm
" Ryman v. [read post]
9 Aug 2009, 9:02 pm
In United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 10:15 am
However, the Court has held that the feds may not commandeer the cooperation of state agents, in Mack and Printz v. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 12:01 pm
In Doe v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 2:22 pm
Jimenez recused himself and then said ASA Angelica Zayas had (and we're not making this up) "Stabbed me in the back. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:00 am
The case is ConocoPhillips Company v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 8:53 am
RE 36,885 ("the RE '885 patent") granted by the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 6:03 pm
And you filed an affirmative asylum claim within a year of coming to the United States (i.e., the DHS didn't catch you).Plus you've got Judge Reinhardt on the panel, and he writes the opinion.In such a setting, you're going to be granted asylum. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 7:35 am
For professors covering or attorneys interested in the fascinating Fifth Amendment privilege issues raised in United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:00 am
See United States v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 4:26 am
Compare In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litig., 391 F.3d 812, 817 (6th Cir.2004) (determining whether attorneys' fees are included in "costs" by reference to the state statute that formed the basis of the suit), Pedraza v. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 8:18 am
Gaudin v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 10:08 am
Franks, the Court unanimously re-affirmed its holding from Garcetti v. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 10:22 am
A defendant convicted of illegal re-entry and use of false identification got a reprieve from the draconian applicable Sentencing Guidelines last week in United States v. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 12:32 am
Re: Sansone v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 7:24 pm
In Biomedical Patent Management v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:12 am
The case of Re W (Children) [2012] EWCA Civ 999, decided today, involved a father's successful appeal against the dismissal of his application for direct contact with his daughters. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:15 pm
Cheney v. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 5:19 am
In view of the decision on continuing effect, the court did not see it necessary to engage with the jurisprudence on ECHR, art 2 procedural/investigative obligations regarding certain deaths predating the entry into force of the HRA (see e.g., R (Keyu) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2015] UKSC 69; Re McCaughey [2011] UKSC 20), which had been discussed at length by the Court of Appeal. [read post]
