Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD"
Results 721 - 740
of 72,234
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Aug 2022, 9:33 am
The original complaint may be viewed here: file:///C:/Users/JNewman/Documents/Long-ex-rel-US-v-Modernizing-Medicine-Daniel-Cane-qui-tam-complaint.pdf The whistleblower is represented by Phillips and Cohen law firm. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:20 pm
Weighing in on one of the most important digital privacy rights cases of the year, EFF is asking the court to hear arguments in Davis v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 1:33 am
defcon9_12_bg_071401.jpg Computer-generated summaries reflecting the insurance company’s indemnity payments and loss adjustment expense payments for insurance claims were admissible as a business record and authenticated under FRE 901(b)(9) by the claims manager who “was familiar with the recordkeeping practices of the company, testified regarding the computer system used to compile and search the insurance claim records, and testified… [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 9:24 am
Bank v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 2:50 pm
” The county also claimed that such records would be investigative records exempt from disclosure. [read post]
22 May 2013, 6:38 am
City of Palm Bay v. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 6:48 am
In oral argument in the appeal of the latter case, the Supreme Court grappled with how broadly to construe Sarbanes-Oxley’s prohibition on “otherwise obstruct[ing]” an official proceeding (U.S. v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 5:01 pm
Dist. v.. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 2:10 pm
Mail Tribune, Inc. v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 12:16 pm
In a recent case, Binh Hoa Le v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 10:00 pm
In Peterson v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:05 am
See Nieder v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 2:31 pm
The Court noted that unlike Graulich v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:00 am
The “personnel records” exemption set out in Civil Rights Law §50-a (1) applies to both active and former employees of the agency Hearst Corp. v New York State Police, 2013 NY Slip Op 03900, Appellate Division, Third Department Supreme Court dismissed the Hearst Corporation’s [Hearst] appeal of an administrative decision denying its Freedom of Information [FOIL] request for “all records” maintained by the Division of State Police… [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 12:13 pm
Within 30 days of the broker’s termination, the brokerage dealer must file a Form U-5 with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority pursuant to Article V, Section 3 of the FINRA by-laws. [read post]
CEQA Administrative Records: Fifth District Opinion Elucidates Rules Governing Contents and Disputes
5 Jan 2012, 10:22 am
” (Madera Oversight Coalition, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 11:36 am
The California Supreme Court decided today in People v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 12:20 pm
VDF v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 5:00 pm
In Capitol Records v. [read post]
