Search for: "ROBERT HART"
Results 721 - 740
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Oct 2007, 1:01 pm
Publisher: Looseleaf Law Publications, Incorporated ISBN or UPC: 1-932777-48-2(Active Record) Format: Trade Cloth Date: Jan 2008 Price $34.95 LC Class #: KF9619.8.P65P48 2007 Dewey #: 345.73/05 ISBN 13: 978-1-932777-48-2 Punishing Persistent Offenders: Previous Convictions and the Sentencing Process Author: Roberts, Julian V. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 5:03 pm
Pero, nos parece, los grandes temas centrales del Derecho, los de la iusfilosofÃÂa, no son debatibles en esa estructura de validación: piénsese en debates o polémicas tipo Hart - Devlin, Dworkin - Bork, Carrió - Soler, Breyer - Scalia (*). [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 11:21 am
Robert B. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:52 pm
Law.com blogger and host, Robert Ambrogi turns to the experts to give their vantage point: Katrina Dewey, the founder of Lawdragon, Mark Beese, Chief Marketing Officer for Holland & Hart and Legal Marketing Association Board Member and Ben Cowgill, lawyer, writer and teacher in the field of legal ethics. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 12:52 pm
Law.com blogger and host, Robert Ambrogi turns to the experts to give their vantage point: Katrina Dewey, the founder of Lawdragon, Mark Beese, Chief Marketing Officer for Holland & Hart and Legal Marketing Association Board Member and Ben Cowgill, lawyer, writer and teacher in the field of legal ethics. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 7:00 am
Please join Law.com blogger and host Robert Ambrogi as he turns to the experts to give their vantage point: Katrina Dewey, the founder of Lawdragon, Mark Beese, Chief Marketing Officer for Holland & Hart and Legal Marketing Association Board Member and Ben Cowgill, lawyer, writer and teacher in the field of legal ethics. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 11:06 am
Yates of Holland & Hart, and features an excellent panel of space law and industry experts. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 7:01 am
Here is a snippet from the text:Professor Robert Alexy wrote a book whose avowed purpose is to refute the basic tenets of a type of legal theory which ‘has long since been obsolete in legal science and practice'. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 7:19 am
Joseph Raz (University of Oxford - Faculty of Law) has posted The Argument from Justice, or How Not to Reply to Legal Positivism (LAW, RIGHTS AND DISCOURSE: THE LEGAL PHILOSOPHY OF ROBERT ALEXY, George Pavlakos, ed., pp. 17-36, Hart Publishing, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 8:36 am
It is operated by Robert Eisenbach, an attorney with Cooley Godward Kronish LLP. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 5:22 am
Conceptual analysis of law is usually associated with Raz and Hart--both positivists who would not (at least on the surface) seem to endorse the subset thesis. [read post]
29 Jul 2007, 10:38 pm
His book was published in 2005 but if he had only waited a few more months, he would have had to reconsider this assessment in light of the nominations of John Roberts and Samuel Alito. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 7:48 am
In Law and Philosophy Hart, Fuller and the Connection Between Law and Justice by Jennifer Nadler. [read post]
26 Jun 2007, 9:45 am
Exploring Criminal Justice
Author: Regoli, Robert M. et al. [read post]
15 May 2007, 10:01 am
Henceforth, the Hart-Fuller Debate shall be known as the Horry-Nash (Non?) [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 11:07 am
the genial local, always and forever smiling, would look at Robert and Mike and say, ? [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 11:46 am
McDougall (b. 1906).By the time you get to the 1960's you have a fourth generation of people like Charles Alan Wright (b. 1927), Guido Calabresi (b. 1932) and John Hart Ely (b. 1938)-- and many others besides-- who are students of the second and third generation realists (although strongly influenced by the legal process school) but who are now associated with other movements in legal scholarship. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 8:17 am
In 1968, Robert F. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:14 pm
Justin Hart posts on it here. [read post]
9 Feb 2007, 4:48 am
We can presume, like Hart and Sacks, that legislatures are composed of rational beings seeking and fulfilling rational ends, and so there must be some point to the CD. [read post]
