Search for: "Reason v. Social Security Administration" Results 721 - 740 of 1,991
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jul 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Forbes had an article “Apple Users Warned About iOS13 Security And Privacy Problem”. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Jeremy Graboyes
For six-and-a-half decades, the Social Security Administration (SSA), the courts, and Congress have engaged in a tug-of-war to find a reasonably reliable, reasonably efficient, reasonably fair source of vocational evidence to support consistent disability adjudication. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Nations are themselves a socially constructed community, imbued with rights, responsibilities and laws. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  (As he himself notes, he in effect put aside the work he had been doing in in order to delve into the world of the internet, including copyright and the implications of the new social media, where he became one of the ranking academics and public intellectuals. [read post]
28 Jun 2019, 8:30 am by Karen Tani
One could write entire articles about the importance of "The New Property"--to constitutional law, administrative law, social welfare law, and legal theory. [read post]
17 Jun 2019, 2:17 pm by Erik J. Heels
Registering your trademarks as soon as possible can also help you secure your brand on the Internet, including domain names and social networking usernames. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 12:09 pm by Gabriel B. Herman
Rodriguez, 628 F.3d 1258 (11th Cir. 2010), the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that a former Social Security Administration (the “SSA”) employee violated the CFAA upon accessing personal records maintained by the SSA for non-business purposes. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 2:59 pm by Juan C. Antúnez
The Social Security Administration has indicated that payment of taxes, administration costs of the trust, and attorney’s fees do not violate the sole benefit rule. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 7:05 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2019)This post is the third of a series of three posts in which the CPE WGE examine the question of paths to empire performed through the choices being made by the U.S. and Chinese leadership cores [领导核心] within the theater of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 6:06 am by Joy Waltemath
She had previously represented to the Social Security Administration that she was unable to work shortly before her termination, but she also brought evidence that she requested an accommodation for a job she could perform with accommodation, and so it was disputed whether she would have been qualified to perform her job with reasonable accommodation under the ADA notwithstanding her representations of disability to the Social Security… [read post]
31 May 2019, 8:28 am by Melanie Fontes
  They advised Secretary Ross that estimates based on administrative sources already found in legal documents—such as Social Security Administration records—“better me[t] DOJ’s [VRA-related] uses” could be used without “harm[ing] the quality of the census count. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
  Though the law has survived innumerable attempts at repeal and administrative sabotage, its intransigent foes, prominently including the Trump administration, are still out to kill it in the courts, and the residual skepticism seeded by the misbegotten-birth narrative could help legitimate their aspiration that, this third, legally absurd, attempt might just succeed. [read post]
30 May 2019, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
Bush White House, in which Kavanaugh was a prominent staffer – the Medicare prescription drug benefit, enacted in 2003, and the partial privatization of social security, proposed in 2006 but not enacted). [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am by Andrew Hamm
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
29 May 2019, 6:59 am by Melanie Fontes
The Trump administration has also advanced the companies’ cause. [read post]