Search for: "Reed, Appeal of" Results 721 - 740 of 2,430
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2019, 8:35 am by Tim Springer
If you have applied for benefits and been denied, contact the attorneys at Bemis, Roach and Reed for a free consultation. [read post]
6 Feb 2019, 10:36 am by Howard Bashman
Superior Court grants Jerry Sandusky new sentencing hearing”: Paula Reed Ward and Bill Schackner of The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette have this report. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at the ransomware phenomenon, how companies are responding, and why. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 11:03 am by Tim Springer
If you have applied for benefits and been denied, contact the attorneys at Bemis, Roach and Reed for a free consultation. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Lord Reed and Lord Kerr dissented stating that the critical factors in the ECtHR decision of Allen should have been followed and consequently it is necessary for the Secretary of State to examine the judgment of the Court of Appeal to determine whether the criteria of s 133 were satisfied. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Petitions for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania were denied. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 2:23 pm
Today's DJ has a full page of promotions, including some SoCal appellate lawyers, such as David Hackett at GMSR and Kasey Curtis at Reed Smith.On the appellate sanctions front, here's an unpub from Friday where sanctions were affirmed for legally frivolous arguments in the trial court (i.e., no abuse of discretion), but not imposed on appeal: "we certainly do not want to punish a lawyer for full-throated advocacy on behalf of his or her client by raising a novel… [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Elements considered by courts in reviewing an individual's appeal of an adverse disciplinary decision by an appointing authorityThomas v Town of Southeast, 2019 NY Slip Op 00446, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn an employee disciplinary matter conducted pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law, judicial review of factual findings made after a hearing is limited to consideration of whether that determination was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Elements considered by courts in reviewing an individual's appeal of an adverse disciplinary decision by an appointing authorityThomas v Town of Southeast, 2019 NY Slip Op 00446, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentIn an employee disciplinary matter conducted pursuant to §75 of the Civil Service Law, judicial review of factual findings made after a hearing is limited to consideration of whether that determination was supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
On 24 January 2019 the UK Supreme Court (Lords Reed and Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear the appeal in the case of Stocker v Stocker. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 12:46 pm by Tim Springer
If you have applied for benefits and been denied, contact the attorneys at Bemis, Roach and Reed for a free consultation. [read post]
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 12:08 am by INFORRM
Today, 24 January 2019, five Supreme Court judges (Lord Reed, Lord Kerr, Lady Black, Lord Briggs and Lord Kitchin) will hear Stocker v Stocker UKSC 2018/0045, an appeal against the 12 February 2018 Court of Appeal decision of Lady Justice Sharp, with whom Lord Justice McFarlane and Sir John Laws concurred ([2018] EWCA Civ 170). [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 9:00 am by Jonathan Bailey
The case eventually went to both an appeals court, which ruled against TVEyes, and the Supreme Court declined to take the case. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 6:00 am by Charlie Dunlap
What CAAF actually said is this: However, an accused has a due process right to a fair trial and appeal, free from the undue influence of superiors, whether they are military officers or civilians in policy and administrative positions. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:48 pm by INFORRM
 A defamation claim, the Claim form and Particulars of Claim are available on Lawtel [£] Court of Appeal We are aware of one media and information law appeal listed in the Court of Appeal this term:  Various Claimants v MGN Limited, 12 or 13 February 2019, Appeal against a judgment of Mann J. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The proposed panel for hand down is Lady Hale, Lord Reed and Lord Kerr. [read post]