Search for: "Regents of The University of California" Results 721 - 740 of 1,090
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2012, 8:45 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:44 am by cebca
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 8:52 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:24 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 8:53 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2011. [read post]
Regents of the University of California, et al. agreeing with some federal courts that the reasoning given for DACA’s rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), which governs the process by which federal agencies develop and issue regulations. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 8:24 am
Regents of University of California 17 C.3d 425,435 (1976) our California Supreme Court held that "as a general rule, one person owed no duty to control the conduct of another, nor to warn those endangered by such conduct," the courts have carved out an exception to this rule in cases in which the defendant stands in some special relationship to either the person whose conduct needs to be controlled or in a relationship to the foreseeable victim of that… [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:50 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 8:30 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 7:59 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
© The Regents of the University of California, 2012. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:05 am by Arthur F. Coon
Regents of University of California (2023) 88 Cal.App.5th 656, which I blogged on in a 3/3/23 post here, and which is currently under review by the California Supreme Court, as explained in my 5/21/23 post here. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 7:10 am by Jonathan H. Adler
One is by the attorneys general from sixteen blue states filed in the Eastern District of New York; the other is by the Regents of the University of California filed in the Northern District of California. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:03 am by Bruce Khula
  There is certainly no shortage of briefing to read: in addition to the petitioner’s brief (PDF) and the briefs of the three respondents — Regents of the University of Michigan (PDF), Board of Governors of Wayne State University (PDF) and Chase Cantrell, et al. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:15 am by Joy Waltemath
Previously in Regents of Univ of Cal v Bakke, Justice Powell wrote in his solo opinion that the attainment of a “diverse student body” is a compelling state interest for an institution of higher education. [read post]
13 May 2009, 12:27 pm
The Patent and Trademark Office first issued a patent for a human gene in 1982 to the Regents of the University of California in connection to a hormone promoting breast development during pregnancy. [read post]