Search for: "Rick Hasen"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,068
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2014, 3:58 am
At Election Law Blog, lawprof Rick Hasen writes: A judge who blogs should not say “STFU” to the Supreme Court. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am
” Rick Hasen responds to Liptak’s analysis at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 5:09 am
The Brennan Center, which has proposed voting reforms, urged the Commission to "think boldly," although Rick Hasen is not sure that it is set up to do so. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:08 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral argument in the Alabama redistricting cases, which Rick Hasen covered for this blog. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:37 am
” Other coverage comes from Katelyn Ferral of The Capital Times, with commentary from Rick Hasen – who at his Election Law Blog observes that “[n]ever before have I seen a cert. petition with even parts of the questions presented redacted. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:55 am
Rick Hasen responds to the story at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:20 am
And, briefly: In Slate, Rick Hasen looks back at Bush v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 5:39 am
If there is a plea bargain the case will not be appealed, and the ruling will stand.Professor Rick Hasen who runs the Election Law Blog believes the case will be overturned on appeal, or at least be reconsidered. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 8:14 pm
Rick Hasen argues that this again demonstrates the need for Congress to create a uniform national scheme to respond to natural and other disasters that affect voting. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 7:26 am
(NOTE: Rick Hasen of Election Law blog has this report on the Court’s order. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am
Rick Hasen covered the opinion for this blog, with other coverage coming from Greg Stohr of Bloomberg News, Richard Wolf of USA Today (who also has a separate story about Justice Clarence Thomas’s opinion in the case), and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:38 am
This opens up the possibility of post-election disputes, mentioned in a post earlier today by my colleague Steve Huefner and this one from Rick Hasen on Slate.com.We can divide potential disputes into two categories. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 4:22 am
Coverage of Justice Neil Gorsuch’s debut this term comes from Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung at Reuters and from Ariane de Vogue at CNN, while commentary comes from Oliver Roeder and Harry Enten at FiveThirtyEight, Ashley Dejean at Mother Jones, Scott Lemieux at Democracy, Mark Joseph Stern at Slate, and Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:03 am
After law school, he served as a law clerk to Judge Edith Jones (5th Cir.) and to Justice Clarence Thomas.Professor Rick Hasen, over at Election Law Blog, quotes this statement from a former partner of Coleman’s at Weil:Greg joined the firm as a young associate, returned after his supreme court clerkship, and returned once again as a partner after serving as the first Solicitor General of the State of Texas. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 11:16 am
H/T to Rick Hasen. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Rick Hasen: “Five Myths About Super PACs”: Must-read Trevor Potter in Washington Post. http://goo.gl/fb/8jyPx [Ed. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 6:36 am
Rick Hasen at the Election Law Blog sees the “fingerprints of Justice Alito all over the” reargument order, while at the Volokh Conspiracy Kenneth Anderson lists some of the questions that he wishes were before the Justices. [read post]
17 Nov 2015, 3:47 am
” At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen has video of Floyd Abrams discussing the Court, the First Amendment, and campaign finance cases. [read post]
31 Dec 2014, 4:41 am
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen reports on another cert. petition from North Carolina – this one involving voting rights. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 3:53 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen remarks that although “[s]ome say the executive order could help things for the Administration, since the President is not subject to the Administrative Procedure Act and doesn’t have to offer reasons for his actions,” “the problem for the administration is that there are injunctions in place preventing the inclusion of the question, whether or not the APA applies. [read post]
