Search for: "Rogers v. United States"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,514
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Aug 2015, 6:56 am
Griffith, Deceased v. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 6:52 am
Securities and Exchange Commission, in which the court will consider whether administrative law judges of the SEC are officers of the United States within the meaning of the appointments clause. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 6:30 am
For the Balkinization Symposium on Rogers M. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:07 pm
Biden—a case in which Roger Severino challenged President Biden’s decision to terminate him from the Administrative Conference of the United States before his term concluded. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:09 am
Roger Estep, in `emotional turmoil. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 2:51 pm
Roger Estep, in `emotional turmoil. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 1:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 8:36 am
United States Fire Ins. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Before the discussion, Clare Cushman will introduce viewers to the Society’s newest publication, An Illustrated Guide to the Supreme Court.The Organization of American Historians is circulating the amicus brief it joined in United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 5:44 pm
Mike Rogers, Sen. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 2:24 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 10:46 pm
Galazz, 34 FLW 335, 3rd DCA, suspended sentence, standing alone, is an illegal sentence - power to suspend sentence can be exercised only as incident to probation - trial court properly vacated the plea - to render suspended sentence illegal, it would be necessary to add term of probationChen and Fifnje, 34 FLW 339, 2nd DCA, Anticipatory warrant - U.S. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 12:30 pm
Nourse, Ralph V. [read post]
8 May 2008, 2:33 pm
City of Columbia, Rogers v. [read post]
6 May 2013, 3:00 am
University of Alberta Faculty of Law BlogThe right to silence In the United States, and to a similar extent in Canada, the right to silence is sacred. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 6:43 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
19 Nov 2011, 11:34 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued a decision relating to the intersection between trade secret law and patent law: Atlantic Research Marketing Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 4:24 am
Trent was convicted of a sex crime in Indiana in May of 2007.Trent asked the court to dismiss the indictment, claiming that the law violated the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 1:58 pm
In this case, the hybrid tennis court was not “used” in the United States - it was “used” in Spain and that use was broadcast in the United States.You can watch some of the match here:Decision affirmedMarcinkowska v. [read post]
