Search for: "SEC v. Downe"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,758
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Feb 2023, 7:02 am
/UK sanctions against the Trickbot cybercrime group, confirmation that Twitter’s sale will not be investigated by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS), and the latest on Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 6:28 am
Continuing my effort to catch up with the Court of International Trade and one decision of the Federal Circuit, we now come upon JBLU, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 5:00 am
SEC Raises the Bar on Tone at the Top by John T. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The Supreme Court majority kicked that question down the line in its 2018 Lucia v. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm
Sec’y, Dep’t of Corr.; McClaim v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 5:51 am
This year the SEC seems to be a bit down. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
CFPB, Barr v. [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 3:44 am
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983), and the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:21 am
This is why the Supreme Court has rightly rejected such heightened security fee policies for parades and demonstrations in traditional public fora (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 5:22 pm
Dept. of Homeland Sec. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On 1 February 2021 Rothman J handed down judgment in the case of Pan v Cheng [2021] NSWSC 30. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 4:56 am
” The Allegations in the Complaint In Azaria v Uhr, a 52% member of 695 Monroe Street, LLC, sued his 48% co-member for an accounting, judicial dissolution, and appointment of a receiver to wind up the LLC’s affairs. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:34 am
Department of Homeland Sec., 284 F. [read post]
9 Jun 2022, 12:21 pm
In light of what a Federal Circuit panel--Chief Judge Kimberly Moore and Circuit Judges Timothy Dyk and Raymond Chen--said at a Tuesday hearing in Thales v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 7:07 am
Not a single Justice in West Virginia v. [read post]
21 Oct 2021, 8:18 am
“Rather than using those funds for development projects that were underwritten by UDF IV, UDF directed the developers to use the loaned money to pay down their older loans from UDF III,” according to the SEC. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:09 pm
In Levitt Corp. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Sources: Ognibene v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 7:56 am
Not only did she flag the constitutional issues surrounding PCAOB (currently in front of the Supreme Court), but her latest paper, Insider Trading and the Gradual Demise of Fiduciary Principles (forthcoming, Iowa Law Review) seems to have predicted the Second Circuit's reversal of the dismissal in the cyberhacking case of SEC v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:02 am
The appeals court further noted that the decisionmaker in HR had incomplete information and could be considered a “cat’s paw” (Hutchens v. [read post]
