Search for: "SHAW V. STATE" Results 721 - 740 of 1,145
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2014, 8:39 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Shaw's clearly established constitutional rights were violated – constitutional rights that were set forth in the seminal case of Farmer v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
” Merrily Archer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
MoranRepresentation and Raceblindness: The Story of Shaw v. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
The court therefore acted properly in ordering him to pay the fees under an account stated theory (Shaw v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 7:47 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
” Citation To The Seyfarth Shaw Workplace Class Action Report Professor Coffee cited Seyfarth Shaw’s Annual Workplace Class Action Report in his declaration in asserting his opinion (at paragraphs 11, 12, and 13 of his declaration). [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 7:16 am
When a police officer found his files, he couldn’t identify the owner of the folder but was able to determine that the IP address being used by the owner was assigned by Shaw Communications, which Shaw identified as Spencer’s sister. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
State of Indiana – Chicago lawyer Jason Stiehl of Seyfarth Shaw on the firm’s blog, Trading Secrets Sunshine backed bonds – time to look on the sunny side? [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:06 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Strumwasser Today we are sharing the second article of a six part series that Seyfarth Shaw LLP is publishing on Inside Counsel. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 10:38 am by Daniel P. Hart
If you are interested in reviewing your existing restrictive covenant agreements for compliance with the new Act, or if you would like assistance drafting such agreements for your workforce, contact a Seyfarth Shaw Trade Secrets Group attorney. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 5:44 am by familoo
This is the text of a Keynote address given by Sir James Munby, President of the Family Division at the Law Society’s Family Law Annual Conference ‘The sacred and the secular: religion, culture and the family courts’ on London 29 October 2013 (H/t to Adam Wagner)    Only a little over a century ago, in 1905, a judge in a family case could confidently opine that the function of the judges was “to promote virtue and morality and to discourage… [read post]