Search for: "STATE V. APPLE" Results 721 - 740 of 4,471
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Sep 2015, 11:00 pm by Doug Austin
 »       Related StoriesDefendant Gets Summary Judgment, Not Dismissal, Due to Plaintiff’s Wiping of Hard Drive: eDiscovery Case LawCourt Rules that State Agency is Not Responsible for Emails Deleted via the Retention Policy of Another State Agency: eDiscovery Case LawBelieve it or Not, Apple v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 11:20 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has granted Apple an extension until July 15 for its final brief, which in formal terms is only supposed to reinforce Apple's appeal of Epic's consolation prize from the district court (an injunction under California Unfair Competition Law) but which Apple will try to use in order to make some final points even on the more important issues in the case.There are two reasons for which Epic lost… [read post]
22 Oct 2012, 1:23 pm by Joel Zand
No federal or state law required Apple to offer consumers voice and data plan choices with other telecoms when the iPhone came to market. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 8:00 pm by John Ehrett
The petition of the day is: Apple, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 2:57 pm by Karen Gullo
ETWHERE: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit livestream:https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC78NfBf28AQe3x7-SbbMC2AFor more on this case:https://www.eff.org/cases/uniloc-v-apple Contact:  AaronMackeySenior Staff Attorneyamackey@eff.org [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 8:50 am by Epstein Becker Green
As featured in #WorkforceWednesday: This week, we examine the enforcement risks employers could face in the complex, state-by-state landscape of abortion law after Roe v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 3:16 am by Florian Mueller
And I learned that just on Tuesday the court lifted the competition law-based injunction, but hasn't stated the reasons yet.That one is a sideshow (deceptive advertising) of a sideshow (a fake patent injunction that had no serious impact), while the one that really matters is the Apple, Foxconn et al. v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 12:06 pm by Florian Mueller
Today there will be a key hearing, styled as a "case management conference", before Judge Lucy Koh, relating to the first of two Apple v. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 6:28 am by Casey Johnston
Department of Justice NEW YORK—In a Manhattan courtroom, Apple and the Department of Justice gave their opening statements in the e-book price-fixing case United States of America v. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 9:49 am by Florian Mueller
But even CCIA may at some point experience such a thing as litigation fatigue: the Apple v. [read post]