Search for: "STATE v KENNEDY"
Results 721 - 740
of 7,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2009, 2:26 pm
Justice Kennedy began by asking what the state would prove in a subsequent hearing. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 9:36 pm
Bottom line, the states want the Court to revive Butler and to expand the theory of coercion that the Court merely acknowledged in Dole and Steward Machine by relying heavily on Justice Kennedy’s concurrences and dissents that have expressed an interest in such an expansion. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 3:10 pm
Via Scotus Blog: The Supreme Court decided Kennedy v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:21 pm
On June 26, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in McCullen v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:21 pm
On June 26, 2014, the Supreme Court issued its decision in McCullen v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:53 pm
The Supreme Court issued a landmark 5-4 decision today in Caperton v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:08 am
United States, No. 07-9712. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 8:02 am
Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court in United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
“If the State agrees with petitioner that damages liability for violations of the self-care provision is necessary to combat discrimination against women, the State may waive its immunity or create a parallel state law cause of action,” Justice Kennedy wrote. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm
Corp. v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:10 pm
On May 27, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in State of Ohio v. [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:18 am
In Reno v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 7:54 am
As we explain below, Citizens United and that portion of Buckley v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 7:52 am
State v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 4:45 am
United States. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 9:32 am
Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
State v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 5:44 am
Coverage continues of the Court’s decisions in United States v. [read post]
