Search for: "STATE v. GAMBLE"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,692
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Feb 2014, 8:26 am
” At The Federalist, Ryan Rodenberg summarizes the facts and issues in a petition for certiorari filed earlier this month by New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, who has asked the Court to weigh in on whether his state can allow regulated sports gambling. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Adams v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
United States, 986 F. [read post]
3 May 2010, 7:25 am
., v. [read post]
31 Mar 2007, 8:17 am
This would make sense, of course, since the FAA is unusual as a federal statute in that it was intended to be enforced and implemented by state courts; the FAA, in and of itself, does not serve as an independent basis for federal question jurisdiction in the federal court system. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
See, e.g., Paul v. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:00 am
Gamble v. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 8:45 am
In fact, in the case Bungie, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:15 am
[26] “Also, the Act’s background discussion points out that the Act itself did not determine the difference between illegal and legal gambling and that it was not intended to alter, limit, or extend any State or Federal law prohibiting or regulating gambling. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am
But as Andy Koppelman has pointed out the litigators in Gill are very smart, and they thought it was worth the gamble to try this case in federal court. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:43 pm
” Gamble v. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 11:12 pm
Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 103 (1976). [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 3:55 am
Gamble, affirming the “dual sovereignty” doctrine. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 3:47 pm
Last month the Supreme Court held in Janus v. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am
” At Justia’s Verdict blog, Michael Dorf considers the non-implications of the oral argument in Gamble v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:39 am
"
"Across California, smoking pot remains a gamble. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:34 pm
Yesterday, in the case of Lindo v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 1:52 am
In this scenario, to state that a person was loitering for the purpose of gambling does not explain how that person was loitering or how they were engage in gambling. [read post]
