Search for: "STATE v. HENNINGS"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,582
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2023, 1:30 pm
In Beck v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 11:36 am
In the words of the court: [W]hen police seek to enter a home and are uncer [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 2:23 pm
Landis v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
" Addressing Plaintiff's argument that the District was liable for the alleged violations of her constitutional rights because it maintained a custom or policy of permitting the Superintendent to make unilateral decisions regarding the enforcement of the District visitor’s policy, in contravention of the written policy placing this authority with school principals, the Circuit Court stated that to establish liability against the District under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 5:41 am
XYZ Two Way Radio Service v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
" Addressing Plaintiff's argument that the District was liable for the alleged violations of her constitutional rights because it maintained a custom or policy of permitting the Superintendent to make unilateral decisions regarding the enforcement of the District visitor’s policy, in contravention of the written policy placing this authority with school principals, the Circuit Court stated that to establish liability against the District under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 6:00 am
United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 4:52 am
Amnesty’s report also charges that the laws on lethal force in 13 states do not even meet the less stringent constitutional standard set by the 1985 US supreme court case Tennessee v Garner. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 4:08 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Connell, et al. v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 4:45 pm
In Rubenstein v. [read post]
26 Mar 2021, 8:12 am
In SuVicMon Development, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 2:57 am
Plaintiff asserts that "[w]hen [her] right foot buckled, [she] reached to [her] right for something to stop [her] from falling but there was nothing to hold onto and [she] fell to the ground. [read post]
31 May 2018, 10:58 am
See Doe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2011, 9:23 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The decision is Sarhan v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 1:41 pm
That did change last week when, in Faulkinbury v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 6:00 am
Faces a Quandary by Peter Henning At issue is the court’s ruling a year ago in Kokesh v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 2:22 am
In Island Sky Corp. v. sky water, D2010-0039 (WIPO February 25, 2010) the Panel found that the “water-related systems offered by the parties … are not strictly, as Complainant asserts, in direct competition with one another. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 8:27 am
In the event state or federal law precludes this policy, then it is of no force or effect. [read post]
24 May 2016, 11:15 am
Finally, in Figueroa v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
The United States Supreme Court has concluded that “[w]hen an employee communicates to her employer a belief that the employer has engaged in . . . a form of employment discrimination, that communication virtually always constitutes the employee’s opposition to the activity. [read post]
