Search for: "Scales v. State" Results 721 - 740 of 4,886
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2015, 2:44 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
   CASE STYLE: State of Texas v Samara Portfolio Management, LLC et al; Cause No. 2013-35721 in the 80th Judicial District Court of Texas (Harris County)    [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 9:32 am by INFORRM
 It persuaded the Court of Appeal in the leading defamation case of John v MGN ([1997] QB 586) which held that in assessing the quantum of an award of damages in a libel case the jury’s attention could properly be drawn to the conventional compensatory scales of damages awarded in personal injury actions, not as a precise correlation but as a check on the reasonableness of their proposed award. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 3:13 am
Prejudice is judged on a sliding scale: a short delay requires a greater showing of prejudice than a lengthy delay. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 10:42 am by Eric Goldman
But the court notes that minors can range from 0-17, and a law is not narrowly tailored if businesses must judge  appropriateness on a sliding scale. [read post]
20 May 2014, 11:37 am
 The question is whether it's unconstitutional for the state to make public donors to that Proposition. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
It has been forcefully argued that the decision of the Court of Appeal is inconsistent with the decision of the House of Lords in Jameel v Wall Street Journal ([2007] 1 AC 359).  [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
  It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 12:07 pm by Jesse Minc Law Group
The State of New York is among the states with the highest incidence of medical malpractice litigation throughout the United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:58 pm
  Even readers of the red-top press and children's comics will probably be well apprised of this case by now, although they might be forgiven for getting this case confused with the seeming millions of other Apple v Samsung, Apple v The World, The World v Apple-type disputes that have been plaguing courts across the globe. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:03 pm
The purpose of former Vehicle and Traffic Law § 510(2)(b)(v) was "to continue State eligibility for the full amount of federal highway funds" by complying with 23 USC § 159. [read post]