Search for: "Sellers v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 1,425
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2014, 2:59 am by Jack Goldsmith
  One little discussed but important question in this vein is what policies the United States should pursue in regulating the global market in zero days. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 10:37 am by admin
The facts are as follows: Supap Kirsaeng came to the United States as a college student in 1997. [read post]
28 May 2017, 5:23 pm by Richard Hunt
And so a jury verdict for the United States against a landlord is good news. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
A weekly (or thereabouts) collection of news about counterfeits, fakes, knockoffs, replicas, imitations, and the culture of copying in general around the globe: Four horsemen: Ralph Lauren sends C&D to PolistasConflict of laws: eBay won't change practices despite German court mandateOriginal Rolex v. eBay court decision (in German)Surrender monkey business: Likelihood of Confusion reportsPen pals: How LVMH prefers to handle fakes on eBay (HT:… [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 6:18 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
Failure to comply with the settlement terms could cost Hobby Lobby $2,000 per day.The forfeiture complaint—docketed in the Eastern District of New York as United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 11:06 am by Ronald Mann
That treaty (to which the United States and about 160 other nations are signatories) obligates nations to enforce arbitration agreements between businesses of member states. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 10:11 pm
Apparently, "romanettes":Monday's Supreme Court oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2011, 7:03 pm by Michael Froomkin
Heddon, 149 U.S. 304 (1893), in which the Supreme Court of the United States had to decide whether at tomato is a fruit or a vegetable for purposes of the Tariff Act of March 3, 1883. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:29 am
In United Scientific Holdings v Burnley [1978] AC 904 (which contains an excellent summary of the principle and its evolution in both law and equity by Lord Diplock) the House of Lords held that in a rent review clause time is presumed not to be of the essence. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255,256). 277 N.Y. at 459, 14 NE.2d at 792 (citation omitted). [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 12:48 pm by Biersdorf & Associates
United States, 292 U.S. 246, 255,256). 277 N.Y. at 459, 14 NE.2d at 792 (citation omitted). [read post]