Search for: "Shields v. United States" Results 721 - 740 of 2,414
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2016, 3:03 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
It clarifies the relationship between two conflicting statutes to encourage the foreign lending of art to the United States. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 1:55 pm by Paige Collings
That’s why we’ve worked to pass data sanctuary laws in pro-LGBTQ+ states to shield health records from disclosure to anti-LGBTQ+ states. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 6:30 am by Andrew Hamm
United States as though it alleged knowing use of perjury, when it actually alleged withholding exculpatory evidence, warrants reversal. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
To state it as a fact: the Church’s hierarchy is responsible for shielding and empowering child sex predators around the globe. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
"The fugitive disentitlement doctrine permits a court to dismiss an appeal if the party seeking relief is a fugitive while the matter is pending' (Degen v United States, 517 US 820, 824 [1996]; see Ortega-Rodriguez v United States, 507 US 234, 242 [1993]). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 11:25 am by Eric
If SOPA had passed, undoubtedly we would have seen an increase in enforcement actions between two foreign litigants without real ties to the United States. [read post]
31 Dec 2022, 2:51 pm by Lee E. Berlik
Both Virginia and D.C. follow the general principles of defamation law that are recognized throughout the United States. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 7:29 am by Alex R. McQuade
Andrew Keane Woods commented on the United States’ tendency for creating, incubating, and training future enemies. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” At National Review, Rachel Bovard argues that “[i]f Google prevails” in Google v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 8:46 am
" The petition raises this question: "Whether the Court of Appeals [Fourth Circuit] erred in affirmed the pleading-stage dismissal, on the basis of the evidentiary state secrets privilege, of a suit seeking compensation for petitioner's unlawful abduction, arbitrary detention, and torture by agents of the United States? [read post]