Search for: "Small v. People"
Results 721 - 740
of 8,509
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2012, 2:42 pm
In this case, K-Beech sued several people for copyright infringement of a small number of porn movies, I believe for downloading and uploading them. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 6:37 am
I have a few small contributions to make to the debate. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 9:01 pm
This has been clear since the Court declared in Brown v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 4:31 am
The case is Citizens for Groundwater Protection et al. v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 1:38 pm
In addition, thanks to Roe v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
To paraphrase a line from an old Randy Newman song, short people got no reason to file a disability discrimination claim under the ADA. [read post]
2 Sep 2014, 8:26 am
These are two interrelated issues in fiduciary duty litigation, and Tatum v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:05 am
We care how much other people make, not because we care about their financial well-being, but because we want to put their number down on the table and measure it against our own. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:13 am
When I travel to red states to oppose an Article V convention, I hear Republicans similarly deny that roughly half of the country genuinely supports policies that they associate with small coastal elites. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 1:12 pm
Whenever the back door opens, there is a small hush until people realize the judges are not yet coming in. [read post]
30 May 2017, 2:42 pm
Court of Federal Claims in PDS Consultants, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 9:45 am
It expresses both the aspirations of indigenous peoples around the world and those of States in seeking to improve their relations with indigenous peoples. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 11:40 am
Wilson v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
The Supreme Court has expressed concern over regulations that act to restrict the political expression of individuals or of small groups of people. [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
28 Nov 2013, 6:27 am
If it is found that the third parties in this case were negligent then the respondent will be liable under its non-delegable duty of care to the appellant. [1] Brown v Nelson & Ors [1971] LGR 20 [2] Gold v Essex County Council [1942] 2 KB 293, 301 [3] Cassidy v Ministry of Health [1951] 2 KB 343 [4] A (Child) v Ministry of Defence [2005] QB 183, 47 per Lord Phillips of Worth [read post]
27 Jan 2020, 4:07 pm
Unite’s contention that its press statement was designed to “shut down” journalistic enquiries was rejected by Nicklin J, who found that the statement that people were joining the Union on a fraudulent basis was “the equivalent of throwing a substantial quantity of fuel over a very small fire” and was in fact “probably the most powerful contributor to the overall defamatory meaning of the Article” [55]. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 9:56 am
Xcentric and Small Justice v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:49 pm
To maintain a society of relative peace and good order--the Canadian credo--is no small achievement, but is's hard to come up with a grand theory that necessarily justifies the hard compromises that may be necessary to attain it. [read post]
