Search for: "Smith v. Gaines"
Results 721 - 740
of 815
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2009, 5:24 am
Smith, D-Queens, joined Senator Craig Johnson, D-Port Washington, at a Mineola news conference to announce a measure that would prohibit registered sex offenders from living within 1,000 feet of a school, park or day-care center, the precise residence requirement contained in the local law that was stuck down. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
The case, Trump v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:26 pm
The shareholders’ ability to gain premiums through takeover activity is subject to the good faith business judgment of the board of directors in structuring defensive tactics. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:01 pm
That problem just got much bigger with the Fourth Circuit’s decision in G.G. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 1:31 pm
Icon at Panorama, LLC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am
Moreover, I include cases in which the object of the sextortion was not the production of pornography but money or other gains. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
In Branzburg v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:13 pm
Smith v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 2:07 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:41 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
23 Dec 2006, 10:50 am
ESTAuburn Tigers (10) v. [read post]
16 Dec 2022, 3:38 am
A draft decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:06 pm
Residents may return, although they are discouraged from leaving, and must self-isolate in one of only four places Yellowknife, Inuvik, Hay River or Fort Smith, regardless of where they actually live. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
Senate adopted a unanimous resolution in March 2015 which states, among other things, that the IoT “has the potential to generate trillions of dollars in economic opportunity” and that the United States should “develop a strategy to incentivize development of the IoT for connected technologies to empower consumers, foster future economic growth, and improve collective social well-being…” If these and similar efforts gain traction in today’s market, the… [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
Last week saw promulgation of Gallagher v Gallagher (No.1) (Reporting Restrictions) [2022] EWFC 52, a summary of which you can find here. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Based on the New York Convention of 1958, arbitration has been accepted almost worldwide as a valuable alternative to litigation.6 At present, the trend towards liberalisation of arbitration and towards empowerment of arbitral tribunals continues to gain acceptance – denoted by the keywords of kompetenz-kompetenz of the arbitral tribunal and of the delocalisation of arbitral awards.7 This concept is aimed at detaching arbitration as an autonomous system of dispute resolution entirely… [read post]
7 Aug 2018, 3:39 pm
Metzenbaum's gun ban gains momentum In the late 1980s, the Senate's leading gun control advocate was Howard Metzenbaum (D-Ohio). [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 8:31 am
The reason why is clear (and helped significantly in gaining passage of 2339B): It is comparatively hard to show a person knows or intends to support a particular criminal act, and comparatively easy to just show they knew or should have known that their support was going to the benefit of a specific organization. [read post]
