Search for: "Stanford Law Review"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,041
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jun 2008, 12:39 pm
Here is the abstract:Refugee Roulette in an Administrative Law Context: The Deja Vu of Decisional Disparities in Agency Adjudication (Stanford Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 2, 2007) on SSRN. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:53 am
(UCLA Entertainment Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 12:25 pm
Joondeph (Santa Clara University - School of Law) has posted The Bridge Builder (Stanford Law Review, Volume 76 (forthcoming 2024)) on SSRN. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 6:47 pm
There was no grade-based invitation to law review (nor, as I recall, was there a "write-on" option). [read post]
17 Feb 2022, 9:03 pm
In an article in the Yale Journal on Regulation, Michael Klausner, professor at Stanford Law School, Michael Ohlrogge, professor at the NYU School of Law, and Emily Ruan, former research associate at Stanford Law School, discussed Special Purpose Acquisition Companies—commonly referred to as SPACs. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 7:00 am
The Stanford Law Review Online has just published an Essay by Edward McCaffery entitled The Dirty Little Secret of (Estate) Tax Reform. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:30 am
A review by Stuart Banner, UCLA Law, in the William & Mary Quarterly of the Bancroft-Prize-winning Freedom Bound by UC Irvine's Christopher L. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:25 am
” Under the circumstances, it is especially fitting that the Stanford Law Review has published the first law review article on asexuality. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 9:37 am
Glaze earned her BA and JD from Stanford. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 4:46 pm
Triantis (Stanford Law School) has posted Promissory Autonomy, Imperfect Courts, and the Immorality of the Expectation Damages Default (Suffolk University Law Review, Forthcoming) on SSRN. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:26 am
Steven Ferrey (Suffolk University Law School) has posted Power Paradox: The Algorithm of Carbon and International Development (Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 19, p. 510, 2008) on SSRN. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 6:39 am
Sergio Puig (Stanford Univ. - Law) & Chester W. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 6:00 am
Huang, Civil Justice in China: Representation and Practice in the Qing (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996).-----, Code, Custom, and Legal Practice in China: The Qing and the Republic Compared (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2002).Law, Gender, and Sexuality Kathyrn Bernhardt, Women and Property in China, 960–1949 (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1999).Margaret Kuo, Intolerable Cruelty Marriage,… [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 7:29 am
Here's that list of journals, taken from the application materials: • Boston University Law Review • California Law Review • Columbia Law Review • Cornell… [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 4:55 am
The final published draft of, The Constitutional Compromise to Guarantee Education, 70 Stanford Law Review 735, is now available. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 10:53 am
Stanford Law Review 70:2 is out online, including a symposium from that conference celebrating the publication of Robert W. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 6:36 am
(David Post) The Op-Ed that Mark Lemley, Dave Levine, and I wrote about the egregious intellectual property bills now pending before Congress (SOPA, Protect-IP, and their ilk) was published today in the Stanford Law Review Online, and is available here for those who are interested (i.e., anyone who cares about the future of communication on the Internet). [read post]
6 Apr 2011, 2:00 am
Tax papers in The Legal Workshop (an online forum of op-ed versions of articles published in the Chicago, Cornell, Duke, Georgetown, Northwestern, NYU, Stanford, Northwestern law reviews): Adam Chodorow (Arizona State), Tracing Basis Through Virtual Spaces, 95 Cornell L. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 7:53 am
The article appeared in the Stanford Law Review. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:47 am
In my forthcoming article, The Constitutional Compromise to Guarantee Education, Stanford Law Review, I argue that, contrary to popular belief, our federal constitution does protect a right to education. [read post]
