Search for: "Starr v State" Results 721 - 740 of 753
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2016, 3:24 am by Peter Mahler
The transcript decision by Vice Chancellor Tamika Montgomery-Reeves in Harrison v Quivus Systems, LLC, C.A. [read post]
4 Nov 2024, 6:39 am by Marty Lederman
In an article here back in July, I explained why Judge Cannon is wrong and why the Supreme Court was correct to hold in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 2:35 pm by Amy Howe
” Kavanaugh – who served as a deputy to Ken Starr during his investigation of then-President Bill Clinton – cited the Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 Jan 2014, 11:38 pm by Kevin LaCroix
They propose a “meaningful modification” of the Court’s holding in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2017, 6:28 pm by Bernie Burk
Circuit Judge Kenneth Starr referred to as “Judge” while acting as the Special Prosecutor investigating President Clinton? [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Michael Mabry stated the following in his declaration: “We havenever been contacted by Aurora nor [sic] any of its agents in person, by telephone or byfirst class mail to explore options for us to avoid foreclosure as required in CC § 2923.5. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am by Molly E. Reynolds, Margaret Taylor
” It was important for the House to enhance the judiciary committee’s subpoena powers in 1974 and 1998 because of the state of the chamber’s rules at the time. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:36 pm by Kevin Russell
Kavanaugh acknowledges that “[i]ndependent agencies are constitutional under Humphrey’s Executor v. the United States” before adding that “what is constitutional is not always wise. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC, representing 26 states, followed by Michael D. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
A person signing a DMCA notice must state a good faith belief that the use is not authorized, declare her authority to act under penalty of perjury, and risk damages for misrepresentation under section 512(f).[3] That source of protection has not technically disappeared, but its value is largely lost when notices are generated not by a person, but by a machine. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:12 am by Steve Lubet
After only a year at DOJ, Roberts was on the “fast track,” which was how his former colleague Kenneth Starr put it in a congratulatory note (82). [read post]