Search for: "State v Mark Brown" Results 721 - 740 of 1,353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Aug 2010, 1:25 am by Kelly
The Glad Products Company et al (Docket Report) Simonian - False patent marking standing motion decided without briefing: Simonian v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 4:11 am by James Romoser
At Mayer Brown’s Class Defense Blog, Archis Parasharami, Kevin Ranlett and Daniel Jones analyze the court’s recent decision in Barr v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 2:48 am by Amy Howe
In commentary at Cato, Jonathan Blanks marks the twentieth anniversary of the Court’s ruling in Whren v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 4:30 am by James E. Pfander
The first has suffered from its criticism of the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 4:31 am
This piece calls for a consultation and indicates that the UK IPO is in principle willing to conduct it [says the IPKat, the state of the law is such that - whether you think threats actions are an abomination or a blessing from heaven - some sort of consultation and rationalisation is long overdue];* A clear and helpful analysis by two lawyers from the New York office of White & Case, Scott T. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
.): When she heard at the vigil that Brown had signed the bill, Kimberly McCauley of Sacramento sat down on the steps and cried. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:18 am
Nonetheless, Reed was thought to have had problems with aspects of the holding in Brown v. [read post]
3 Aug 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
” For lawyers and law professors, constitutional history goes like this: the Constitutional Convention, Ratification, the Bill of Rights, the Reconstruction Amendments, the New Deal, Brown v. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 3:02 pm by Eugene Volokh
A cross by the side of a public highway marking, for instance, the place where a state trooper perished need not be taken as a statement of governmental support for sectarian beliefs. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:59 pm by Eugene Volokh
A cross by the side of a public highway marking, for instance, the place where a state trooper perished need not be taken as a statement of governmental support for sectarian beliefs. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Brown and Clarksburg Nursing Home & Rehabilitation Center, LLC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
    **Courts Matter Or They Don’t**The first third of Mark’s book synthesizes and expands on some rueful academic analyses of the Supreme Court, including how the Court failed to dismantle racial subordination in the aftermath of Brown v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am by Ronald Collins
Judges were participants in the tradition and had to abide by its rules – both stated and unstated. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
My students Curtis Brown, Sara Liss, and Ali Vaqar worked on the brief. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Macro: it is more attractive on the whole even if I’m not going to purchase disparagingly marked products. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: US CAFC: Continuation limits invalid; limits on claims and RCEs are ok: Tafas v Doll (Patently-O) (Law360) (Hal Wegner) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Promote the Progress) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (IP Spotlight) (Inventive Step) (IP Watchdog) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Anticipate This!) [read post]