Search for: "State v. Alexander" Results 721 - 740 of 2,085
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2012, 8:08 am by Lawrence Solum
Part V begins by sketching the total recasting of the criminal law that Larry Alexander and I propose in our book, but then offers suggestions for how to more modestly reform the criminal law to better capture the myriad aspects of culpability. [read post]
15 May 2023, 3:55 am by Lawrence Solum
Section V reviews an anti-bribery statute enacted by the first Congress. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
— Keith Bentele and Alexander Ibsen Kappos v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 3:28 am by Eleonora Rosati
This year, the keynote speech will be delivered by Allan James, Senior Hearing Officer at the UKIPO.The event will now dedicate one of its two panels to a discussion of the Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Lidl v Tesco.Starting at 2pm and finishing with drinks and canapes from 6:15pm at Simmons’ offices in Citypoint, Moorgate, the full line up is below:14:00-14:30 – Registration14:30-14:40 – Introduction and welcome (Darren Meale)14:40-15:40 – Panel 1… [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
The second, by Walter Alexander Bailey, shows the former Watts Mill.A judge will address the group about landmark cases, likely including the Swope Park pool desegregation case, Williams v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Orrin Hatch
As Chief Justice Marshall famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 9:28 pm by Orrin Hatch
As Chief Justice Marshall famously explained in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 8:33 am
Round one has been won by lawyer James Alexander in New York in Alexander v. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:16 am by Suzanna Sherry
Maine (an earlier state sovereign immunity case) and District of Columbia v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
At the very beginning of it all, in 1790, there was Virginia’s furious ‘memorial’ claiming the unconstitutionality of the Funding Act, which prompted Alexander Hamilton’s tremulous response: ‘This is the first symptom of a spirit which must either be killed or will kill the constitution of the United States. [read post]