Search for: "State v. Ali"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,248
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2013, 2:37 pm
AE 144: Government Notice of Ongoing Command Investigation (Legal Bins) The 9/11 session will follow another hearing in the other Guantanamo capital case, United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
Anticipating what a victory for same-sex advocates could mean in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 8:24 pm
For example, in Matar v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 9:03 pm
(A copy of the panel’s decision in Hamdan v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:19 am
Cir. 2009) (“Rasul II”), Ali v. [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 5:49 am
While some other stuff was going on yesterday, my friend Lindsay Harrison at Jenner & Block and I filed an amicus brief on behalf of the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers and in support of certiorari in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 7:51 am
Reasons not to borrow: (1) Wrong idea, like Whelan v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:05 am
[Ali v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 11:55 am
United States, which is currently pending appeal. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 7:34 am
Ali. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 11:09 am
Fresh from the Guantanamo security scrub: an amended docketing order for the upcoming hearing, late this month, in United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
Caldwell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 8:55 pm
The case of Ali Shaygan v. [read post]
31 Oct 2012, 3:50 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Crocs Europe BV v Anderson & Anor (t/a Spectrum Agencies) [2012] EWCA Civ 1400 (30 October 2012) McCarrick v Hunter [2012] EWCA Civ 1399 (30 October 2012) Joyce v Epsom and Ewell Borough Council [2012] EWCA Civ 1398 (30 October 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Gregory v Benham [2012] EWHC 2971 (QB) (26 October 2012) Joseph & Ors v Spiller & Anor [2012] EWHC 2958 (QB) (26 October 2012) High Court… [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 1:08 pm
Omar Ali Rizvi, Bellwether Venture Capital Fund I, Inc., and Strategy Partners, LLC Case number: 10-cv-1632 (United States for the Eastern District of Texas) Case filed: July 31, 2009 Qualifying Judgment/Order: July 24, 2012 09/04/2012 12/03/2012 2012-93 SEC v. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 11:54 pm
Lakshmanan Fireworks Industries v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Id.To get around TwIqbal, the plaintiffs in Ali trotted out Hofts v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:01 am
ak Çali V. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 7:09 am
The judgment is an important one, not only because it found that isolated DNA did not fall under the laws of nature exception, despite the United States Supreme Court's remand that the case be reconsidered in light of the enlarged scope of the exception in Mayo Collaborative Services v Prometheus Laboratories (see the IPKat here and here), but also due to its discussion of the incentives behind innovation and the reasons given for its strict adherence to the existing legal… [read post]
