Search for: "State v. Branch" Results 721 - 740 of 6,957
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2019, 7:55 am by Deborah Heller
Clark responded in the negative and reasoned it was because the executive branch and not the judicial branch is meant to handle exigent circumstances. [read post]
24 Aug 2024, 6:15 am by Lawrence Solum
Marion County Elections Board, which allowed states to enforce voter ID laws and make it harder for people to vote The Court v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 5:15 am by SHG
Amici are 23 United States Senators and 105 members of the United States House of Representatives. [read post]
In footage shot in 2011, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit hears argument in Jewel, and an attorney from the Department of Justice tries to convince a skeptical court that it should simply decide not to decide the case, leaving it to the other branches of government. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm by renholding
Numerous studies show that Chevron deference is currently the exception rather than the rule, and since 2001’s United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
For a short time in 2012, Karel Zegers was the Acting President of the Victorian branch of the Sporting Shooters Association of Australia (“SSAAV”). [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 7:00 am by Will Baude
But the CAAF does not and cannot exercise judicial power because it is part of the executive branch, and not the judicial branch of the United States or any other government. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 7:05 pm by Samantha Maddern
Background In CFMEU Queensland District Branch v Workpac Pty Ltd [2017] FWC 1995 WorkPac had been negotiating with the CFMEU for a replacement enterprise agreement for almost a year. [read post]
 This led the Commission to consider that the profits should have been allocated to the AOE and ASI Irish branches instead of to the head offices, which were not fiscally resident anywhere. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:31 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) After a long discussion of the breadth of the speech restriction involved in the case, Chief Justice Roberts’ majority in United States v. [read post]