Search for: "State v. Burden"
Results 721 - 740
of 24,598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 8:45 am
Take, for example, Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 5:57 am
Times v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
The Court raised the evidentiary burdens of plaintiff’s prima facie case considerably, and shifted the burden of proof on truth or falsity, such that tort liability met First Amendment demands. [read post]
31 May 2014, 11:13 am
Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:33 pm
Charlie’s Waste Services, LLC v. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:17 pm
Boumediene v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 7:48 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 8:40 am
I have always viewed Roe v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:57 am
Muskat v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 11:45 am
The Supreme Court in Gross v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 3:11 pm
” (State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 3:45 pm
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit (which covers Alabama, Florida, and Georgia), held "in order for a fact finding body to ignore a regulation in calculating 'just compensation' for a given piece of property, the landowner must show that the primary purpose of the regulation was to depress the property value of land or that the ordinance was enacted with the specific… [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 8:38 am
In Abbott Laboratories v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 5:00 am
In the case of Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 12:58 pm
Bristow v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
Hence Irwin LJ found that the “underlying principle in Zambrano is undisturbed by Chavez-Vilchez” and in the latter case the referring court was looking for guidance in circumstances where a child was dependent on one non-EU parent with no right of residence; circumstances in which the state must ensure a careful process of enquiry. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 10:04 am
P'ship v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 5:47 pm
I think I was right at the time, but I no longer believe this is a tenable interpretation of Kennedy's view of the undue burden standard in Gonzales v. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 2:16 pm
Broad application and absence of religious hostility are dispositive, not the severity of the free-exercise burden nor the importance of the state’s interest. [read post]
