Search for: "State v. Christmas"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,218
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2018, 6:24 am
Justice Newby of our Supreme Court discussed the movie’s criminal law implications in his concurring opinion in State v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 8:24 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 5:11 am
The petition in Kelly v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 4:16 pm
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Australia On 15 December 2017 Chaney J handed down judgment in the case of Rayney v State of Western Australia [2017] WASC 367. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:37 am
v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
In Maier, it was stated: “[78] … the court must then consider a notional and fair use of that mark in relation to all of the goods or services in respect of which it is registered. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm
Sarnoff, BIO v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 10:32 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2014, 6:37 am
" He served a 30-day sentence over the Christmas holidays and still lives under a three-year supervised release program. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 4:44 am
After a hard-fought several rounds in the CJEU and the UK courts, it all seemed all over; however, the EU General Court offered us a new judgment as an early Christmas present in mid-December.The case of Mondelez UK Holdings & Services Ltd, formerly Cadbury Holdings Ltd v EUIPO dealt with an EU registered trademark (2632529) for a three-dimensional mark comprising of the Kit Kat chocolate bar without any markings. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm
When I first reported on the "bombshell" ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) in GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 8:57 am
Merry Christmas! [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
Medicaid After-Hours Claims Audits (CPT Code 99050 / CPT Code 99051) by State Medicaid Regulators are Continuing. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:59 am
Bursac v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 8:20 am
Case citation: State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:09 am
Not only has she been overseeing the building of a new office in High Holborn (which will be fully open and operational from the beginning of January), she has also found time to write a post on the recent pre-nuptial case Z v Z, and another on Meeting “reasonable needs”: matrimonial v non-matrimonial assets. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The initial facts in Frick v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 4:52 pm
I'll be sending out Christmas presents to your family. [read post]
