Search for: "State v. Core" Results 721 - 740 of 7,959
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2016, 3:01 am
Procedure serves to enable, guide and at times even compel interaction between states and other international actors, including non-state actors. [read post]
16 May 2023, 12:59 pm
The United States Forest Service granted a timber permit for doing just that way up in the Idaho panhandle -- that strip of land way up north near Canada. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 1:54 pm by Frank Remington
This summer, the United States Supreme Court handed down a decision in the case of Executive Benefits Insurance Agency v. [read post]
17 Mar 2017, 2:08 pm by Joe Koncelik
State Categorical Grants fund core programs, such as implementation of the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, hazardous waste regulation (RCRA) and the Safe Drinking Water Act. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Joshua Matz
Ilya Shapiro and Carl DeNigris of CATO@Liberty contend that in this week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
It is however still an authorised anaesthesia, in this country and the States and indeed is listed as a core medicine in the World Health Organisation’s list of “essential drugs”. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:15 am
The court noted that the certificates were affidavits falling squarely within the "core class of testimonial statements" covered by the Confrontation Clause as set forth in Crawford v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 8:40 am by Ellen T. Berge and Shahin O. Rothermel
The core concepts underpinning the various state laws, as well as the federal Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act (ROSCA), include clear and conspicuous disclosures of offer terms, affirmative consent to the offer terms, and a simple cancellation mechanism. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:57 am by Mark S. Humphreys
  In 1944, the United States Supreme Court in the case styled, United States v. [read post]