Search for: "State v. Court of Appeals, Division I"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,097
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am
The following is a copy of the Court of Appeals decision and I will blog the Supreme Court’s decision once it is published: 143 Wash.App. 373, 177 P.3d 769 Court of Appeals of Washington,Division 1. [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 2:01 am
This, however, presented a question of credibility, which the Board was free to resolve against troopers and the court declined to substitute its judgment for that of the Board and the Superintendent.The Appellate Division said that the test applied [i]n assessing whether an administrative decision is supported by substantial evidence is whether the finding is supported by the type of evidence that a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support the conclusion… [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 3:06 pm
Alegre (September 23, 2009), the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division Two) weighed in on discovery conduct. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
This motion to put the entire case on hold will be based on a decision by the Central Reexamination Division of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to reject all claims of U.S. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:14 am
In Polhamus v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 7:49 am
Hamet v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 5:54 pm
i? [read post]
10 May 2022, 2:09 pm
The insurers appealed, and the Appellate Division affirmed the Supreme Court’s decision in full and largely adopted its reasoning. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 9:29 am
While I don’t like that outcome, I can’t blame the judge for being a bit confused about how these cases should be decided, considering the state of the past case law reviewed in this opinion (the match-head case in particular). [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 7:38 pm
On November 19th the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division) ruled on the scope of a contractual non-exclusive jurisdiction clause in the context of a damage claim for breach of EU competition law (Ryanair Ltd v Esso Italiana Srl [2013] EWCA Civ 1450). [read post]
20 Aug 2008, 3:10 pm
In yesterday's post, I reported on Felton-Shepherd Industries, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 6:31 am
“Domestic Relations Division actions may be transferred from suburban municipal district court locations to the Richard J. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
In a case decided on November 17, Inland Atlantic Old National Phase I, LLC et. al. v. 6425 Old National, LLC, the Fourth Division Court of Appeals of Georgia ruled on fiduciary duties owed under joint venture agreements, applied rules of contract construction, and briefly addressed substantial versus strict compliance. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
In a case decided on November 17, Inland Atlantic Old National Phase I, LLC et. al. v. 6425 Old National, LLC, the Fourth Division Court of Appeals of Georgia ruled on fiduciary duties owed under joint venture agreements, applied rules of contract construction, and briefly addressed substantial versus strict compliance. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 8:33 am
In a case decided on November 17, Inland Atlantic Old National Phase I, LLC et. al. v. 6425 Old National, LLC, the Fourth Division Court of Appeals of Georgia ruled on fiduciary duties owed under joint venture agreements, applied rules of contract construction, and briefly addressed substantial versus strict compliance. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 8:17 am
This Court has no authority to overturn a determination of the Appellate Division. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 5:45 am
” at 3).The Eleventh District Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
Last month the supreme court decided State v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
In August 2017, I reported that the SCC would hear an appeal from the Court of Appeal for Alberta (Orphan Well Association v Grant Thornton Limited, 2017 ABCA 124). [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 3:17 pm
Last month the supreme court decided State v. [read post]
