Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 721 - 740
of 40,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2016, 9:00 am
The settlement in Illinois v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 12:52 pm
The judgment of the Court of Appeal in Dixon v Marchant, handed down yesterday, may, I think, lead to some debate, and not just amongst family lawyers. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 12:22 pm
The Court's opinion could come down before the Colorado Secretary of State declares the official winner. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
On February 6, 2012, the Court of Appeal (First Appellate District, Division One) handed down its opinion in Duran v. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:56 pm
Virginia, which struck down state laws banning interracial marriages as unconstitutional. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
In Maxwood v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 8:21 am
[See coverage of another case from the November 22nd hand down list.] [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:10 pm
Another resident called police and claimed that approximately 2 months earlier she had witnessed him tearing down ceiling tiles in the dorm, which resulted in approximately $250.00 in damage. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 8:22 pm
Detectives had hospital workers hold down Mr. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 8:18 am
While the Ninth Circuit case was pending, Prager doubled down by initiating a parallel state court lawsuit. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
I have posted my latest piece, Obergefell v. [read post]
19 Dec 2008, 4:07 pm
Good, handed down on Monday, is great news for friends of federalism. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:31 am
Justice Alito delivers opinion in Murphy v. [read post]
21 May 2020, 7:38 am
In Ramos v. [read post]
13 Sep 2008, 3:23 pm
Yesterday, in Jaynes v. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 8:59 pm
His reasoning is now provided in the judgment handed down yesterday. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 12:49 pm
”); United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2024, 8:42 am
The court summarizes: The primary effect of the DPIA provision is to compel speech…The State cannot insulate a specific provision of law from a facial challenge under the First Amendment by bundling it with other, separate provisions that do not implicate the First Amendment The court also says that the DPIA requirement “deputizes covered businesses into serving as censors for the State” because the DPIA risk “factors require consideration of content or… [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court decision Roe v. [read post]
