Search for: "State v. Fan" Results 721 - 740 of 2,632
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2018, 1:51 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Relies on member states; referrals go through national authorities. [read post]
3 May 2018, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
  Most authoritatively, the CJEU in L’Oreal v eBay states that a host that has acted non-neutrally in relation to certain data cannot rely on the hosting protection in the case of those data (judgment, para [116]). [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:51 pm by Ilya Somin
Article II of the Constitution states that "The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 10:29 am by Graham Smith
"  Courts in Ireland (Mulvaney v Betfair), the UK (Kaschke v Gray, England and Wales Cricket Board v Tixdaq) and France (TF1 v Dailymotion) have reached similar conclusions (albeit in Tixdaqonly a provisional conclusion). [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 9:00 pm by Carl Custer
The authors wrote, “The maximum observed log reduction of L. monocytogenes was 2.15 ± 0.04 for balsamic vinegar (50% (v/v)), 1.18 ± 0.06 for white wine vinegar ((50% (v/v)) and 1.13 ± 0.06 for acetic acid ((50% (v/v)). [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 8:00 am by David Kris, Nate Jones
Trump likewise is no fan of such constraints or institutions, expressing (at various times and to various degrees) criticism of NATO and the United Nations. [read post]
17 Mar 2018, 5:47 am by INFORRM
  Even his most ardent fan could not deny he is no wordsmith or great thinker (despite him saying: ‘I know words, I have all the best words’). [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:24 pm by becassidy
  The decision helped to fan the flames of the march to Civil War in the United States. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm by Ilya Somin
It is also possible that the Trump administration (which is no fan of Obamacare) will choose not to defend the constitutionality of the mandate, in which case the court might appoint an independent lawyer to defend the statute (as it did in the 1982 Bob Jones case) or allow blue states to step in to defend (as lawyers hired by mostly Republican members Congress were allowed to step in to defend a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Obama administration refused to… [read post]