Search for: "State v. Hall"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,234
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2020, 6:56 am
My essay addresses some of the legal issues: whether bans are "generally applicable" under Employment Division v Smith, how courts might weigh the burden on religion against the state's interest in curbing the epidemic, whether less-restrictive means are available, etc. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:41 am
Among his numerous successes is the $570M breach of contract and patent infringement verdict for his client in Medtronic v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
3 May 2020, 6:30 am
Madison, and the Missouri Crisis are told alongside less familiar ones like Martin v. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 3:56 pm
State, 2020 Ga. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 9:59 am
(relisted after the April 24 conference) Hall v. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 11:21 am
Hall, 440 U. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:58 am
Lord Carnwath said that “the law must aspire to be a unified institution, the parts of which – contract, tort, the criminal law – must be in essential harmony” quoting McLachlin J in Hall v Hebert [1993] 2 SCR 15, 175-176. [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 3:00 am
His high-profile cases include the “trial of the century,” otherwise known as United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 11:38 pm
Babb v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 7:18 am
He finds that the defendant in this case was denied proper representation because counsel did not object to questionable eyewitness and other evidence.The case is United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 11:33 am
The case is Simmons v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 9:11 am
First, while some of the dissent is a reiteration of complaints Gorsuch raised in his dissent two years ago in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 11:59 am
See Roberts v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 7:00 am
The SJC cited a United States Supreme Court case involving a state statute extinguishing mineral rights when not exercised for 20 years, Texaco, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2020, 1:08 am
The ultimate plan will be implemented in coordination with other states in the multi-state council. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:48 pm
” (Campbell v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 6:31 am
State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 8:27 am
This is one of those (rare) case, all the more remarkable because the inmate won his appeal pro se against the Connecticut Attorney General's office.The case is Gaffney v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 6:55 am
Unfortunately for the plaintiff who brought this case, the tea-bagging does not give him a lawsuit.The case is Hoit v. [read post]