Search for: "State v. Jim"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,304
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2008, 6:34 am
But remember at the February 6 hearing in State Farm v. [read post]
30 Mar 2017, 4:41 am
Briefly: At the Special Education Law Blog, Jim Gerl discusses last week’s decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Birnbaum, and Haimavathi V. [read post]
20 Jun 2020, 2:20 pm
Gaines v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 2:26 pm
Bill Ruthhart of the Indianapolis Star reports this afternoon on the Supreme Court decision earlier today in the case of City of Carmel, Indiana v. [read post]
26 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
S., at 693; see United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 5:46 pm
United States. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am
The Supreme Court’s big Second Amendment case this term was United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:31 am
Tinsley v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 11:41 pm
We'll start close to home, with a pair of Bay Area attorneys opining unfavorably on Cal Law about the Ninth Circuit's US. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 5:19 am
Jim Harper discusses the amicus brief that Cato filed in the hotel privacy case City of Los Angeles v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 4:51 am
There aren’t many circuit court decisions on violations of the Posse Comitatus Act, so the 9th Circuit’s opinion in United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
Following oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 6:32 am
Jim Neer, et al., 2015-0348 (argued Feb 9, 2016) Ross J. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 4:11 pm
Oral arguments were heard yesterday by the Supreme Court in the "robo-call" case, State of Indiana v. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 10:38 am
In the leading Insular case, Downes v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm
I discuss this history in a bit more detail in Chapter 5 of The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. [read post]
10 Dec 2006, 9:15 pm
Yesterday in a bookstore I looked at a copy of Jim Newton's new biography of Earl Warren. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 7:13 am
The Associated Press reports here on the aftermath of Ramirez v. [read post]
