Search for: "State v. Kitchen"
Results 721 - 740
of 1,242
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2014, 1:50 am
Restaurants Ltd's application; opposition by Société Anonyme Des Bains De Mer Et Du Cercle Des Etrangers (here), in which Dermot Doyle, to the great and continued approval of this weblog, excoriated the approach of slinging the kitchen sink at trade mark applicants by raising a plethora of grounds which almost all have no substance whatsoever. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
1 Jan 2014, 7:00 am
As reported by Lyle Denniston at SCOTUSblog, yesterday the state of Utah filed an Application (full text) seeking an immediate stay pending appeal of the Dec. 20 federal district court decision in Kitchen v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 7:22 pm
Unresolved in 2013, the FTC v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:41 pm
The application (Herbert v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 6:40 am
However, it granted summary judgment to the company on the employee’s state law age bias claim (Wagner v Gallup, Inc, December 19, 2013, Ericksen, J). [read post]
24 Dec 2013, 10:04 pm
The judges set the case (Kitchen v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm
In State v. [read post]
21 Dec 2013, 4:17 pm
In Kitchen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
FURTHER UPDATE: The state’s appeal to the Circuit Court has now been docketed as 13-4178, Kitchen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 1:46 pm
In his opinion in Kitchen v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:20 am
Supreme Court held in Florence v. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 5:11 am
Google’s own amicus brief in this case states it receives &ldqu [read post]
14 Dec 2013, 12:44 pm
Belimo Automation v. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 5:57 am
State v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 7:54 am
See Strayhorn v. [read post]
20 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
– San Miguel Brewing International Limited v. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am
” (at [7]).The Learned Lord Justice does not appear to have been addressed at all (let alone at any length) on why that is wrong, but has stated it as law nonetheless. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 9:09 am
” (at [7]).The Learned Lord Justice does not appear to have been addressed at all (let alone at any length) on why that is wrong, but has stated it as law nonetheless. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:06 am
EEOC v. [read post]