Search for: "State v. Lane"
Results 721 - 740
of 2,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2012, 8:33 am
The court in Himmelsetin v. [read post]
CA1: the First says that 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) is constitutional, because it isn't a rule of decision
8 Feb 2008, 12:42 pm
" The First then distinguishes United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 12:15 pm
Fowler, 2007 BCSC 1678, Madam Justice Holmes stated: [34] In Tucker (Public Trustee of) v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
This summary of facts from a recent case - United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
Tolliver v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 7:32 am
Further, in Sesler v. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 4:23 pm
High Desert State Prison, 2008 U.S. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:15 am
In Klein v. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 5:33 am
In Teague v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 5:06 pm
Daniel Schwartz chimes in on yesterday's hot topic, Thompson v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
In Hospadales v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 7:03 am
In Hospadales v. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 10:49 am
by Dora Lane Dora Lane AB 5 (Codifies the “ABC” Test for Contractor Status) AB 5 codifies the “ABC” Test for determining contractor status which was adopted by the California Supreme Court in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Sep 2021, 6:33 pm
The crash happened on I-93 N, near mile marker 19.6 and the Exit 6 off-ramp, at about 5:40 a.m. 28-year-old Manchester resident Sean MacDonald, operating a 2006 Yamaha V-Star motorcycle, reportedly went across multiple lanes of traffic just before he crashed into the back of a box truck being driven by 26-year-old Alton man Cody Hannaford. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 1:24 pm
Both Linda Maichl, at Ulmer & Berne, who represents generic drug manufacturers, and Justinian Lane, who hosts a plaintiff-side blog, sent us copies of the Solicitor General’s brief for the United States as amicus curiae in the Supreme Court Pliva/Mensing case. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
Moreover, "[u]nder settled principles, the doctrine of estoppel will not provide eligibility [to retirement benefits] where by statute a person clearly does not qualify" (Matter of Price v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 107 AD3d 1212, 1216 [3d Dept 2013] [internal quotation marks, brackets and citation omitted]; see Matter of Schuyler v New York State & Local Employees' Retirement Sys., 158 AD3d 909, 912 [3d… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 9:56 pm
In general, the FTC has historically proclaimed that the standard of substantiation is “Competent and Reliable Scientific Evidence,” a standard that the FTC has stated is flexible. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:46 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 5:22 pm
Placerville Historic Preservation League v. [read post]
