Search for: "State v. Lord"
Results 721 - 740
of 4,049
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
On 24 October 2019 there will be a trial in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers before Warby J. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 2:18 pm
D. and A. v United Kingdom 32949/17 34614/17 The Supreme Court (Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath dissenting) found justified discrimination in imposing the bedroom tax on a woman who, as a result of domestic violence, had had her home treated under the Sanctuary Scheme to include the modification of the attic to render it a “panic room”. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 11:48 am
Huawei/Conversant v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 11:47 am
Huawei (consolidated with Conversant v. [read post]
22 Oct 2019, 5:52 am
The lord doesn't think he's a judge. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 12:15 am
On 24 October 2019 there will be an application in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
18 Oct 2019, 11:28 am
Rotkiske states that he had no knowledge of the proceeding and therefore failed to appear. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 11:15 am
Norris catching up on IPKat after some hard partyingphoto credit: https://www.learningliftoff.comPatentWhen Shakespeare wrote "something is rotten in the state of Denmark," he might have very well been describing the Danish court system in 2019. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:09 am
Lord Reed and Lord Lloyd-Jones gave the judgment, with whom all members of the Court agreed. [read post]
12 Oct 2019, 7:09 am
Continental v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:00 am
• Thomas V. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:23 pm
On 24 October 2019 there will be an application in the case of Lord Sheikh v Associated Newspapers. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am
See Final Decree, in Transcript of Re cord, West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am
This means that it was null and of no effect: see, if authority were needed, R (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51, para 119. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
Bush v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 1:49 pm
L. 330, where the House of Lords stated: If, in what I may term the natural user of that land, there had been any accumulation of water, either on the surface or underground, and if, by the operation of the laws of nature, that accumulation of water had passed off into the close occupied by the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff could not have complained that that result had taken place. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:41 pm
” A v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2005] 1 AC 68, Lord Bingham. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
A crowd question from what was apparently no less than a member of the House of Lords reminded us of the political charge of the Brexit debate (and enabled this foreigner to check off meeting a Lord from his London Visit To-Do List). [read post]
19 Sep 2019, 10:01 am
The constitutional importance of this point is clear: in R (on the application of Bancoult) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, which was cited by Lord Pannick on behalf of Gina Miller during his oral submissions, Lord Hoffmann held that ‘the unique authority Parliament derives from its representative character’. [read post]
